Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the sanctions worked
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 10/14/4 | Debra J. Saunders

Posted on 10/14/2004 8:03:45 AM PDT by SmithL

IT TURNS OUT that the anti-war crowd was right that national leaders' decisions on what to do about Iraq were based on oil and greed -- they were just wrong about which countries' leaders. According to the new Iraq Survey Group study by intelligence analyst Charles Duelfer, Saddam Hussein systematically bribed or greased the palms of officials and businessmen from countries that are permanent members of the U.N. Security Council -- France, Russia and China -- with the goal of undermining the U.N. sanctions. Not only did that strategy work, but Hussein's corruption of the Oil for Food program also bankrolled his lethal projects.

Oil for Food was supposed to feed the hungry in Iraq, but it turned into a bonanza that delivered $350 million to Hussein's Military Industrial Commission in 2001. As Hussein said in 2000, "We have said with certainty that the (U.N.) embargo will not be lifted by a Security Council resolution, but will corrode by itself." Duelfer told the Senate Armed Services Committee that "sanctions had steadily weakened to the point where Iraq, in 2000-2001, was confidently designing missiles around components that could only be obtained outside sanctions."

The bottom line: Those who argued that President Bush and the world should "let the sanctions work" had no idea that the sanctions were funding the planned return of weapons of mass destruction with missiles that could propel them beyond Iraq.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: sanctions
Debra nails it.
1 posted on 10/14/2004 8:03:46 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This and the Richard Spertzel article in the WSJ need to be spread out around the country ASAP.


2 posted on 10/14/2004 8:19:29 AM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Note the page # on this: B-9. If the Chron is laid out like my local paper, that's buried in the Business section. Any Bay Areas types out there who can verify where this excellent article appeared in the "dead-tree" version?


3 posted on 10/14/2004 8:57:09 AM PDT by macbee ("Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macbee

It seems so simple but the MSM makes it so difficult....If the leftist SFGATE can put two and two together how come the LA and NY Times can't????


4 posted on 10/14/2004 9:05:32 AM PDT by Republic Rocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: macbee

This is the op-ed section of the SF Comical. She is the token republican, and a RINO at that!


5 posted on 10/14/2004 9:07:11 AM PDT by Hayzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

btt


6 posted on 10/16/2004 7:35:44 PM PDT by GailA ( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
MASTER LIST UN OIL/SEX FOR FOOD SCANDALS
7 posted on 10/17/2004 12:54:24 PM PDT by GailA ( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson