Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saradippity; sinkspur
The crickets on this thread from the absence of certain people are deafening

Maybe they are silent beause they realize how "progressive,'freedom-loving?',neo-conservatives",will attack with a flurry of supercilious,snide and sarcastic remarks and there is no point in wasting the time trying to defend something that at "face value" can be construed as wrong. It is too complicated and complex to even try to sort out,since truth doesn't matter to the enemies of Keyes anyway.

Face it sinkspur,most of the Keyes supporters are brighter,more genuine and more honest than the opposition. They are also more idealistic which just sets some pragmatists into a fury.

FYI There are about six topics that will trigger the usual sharks to unite and attack.

………

Yeah, the Keyes supporters are better to their pets too. brighter,more genuine and more honest , classic Democratic talking point.

Actually it’s not such a difficult question to answer. He took in over $15 million in 2000, over $8 million from individuals. I’m not sure an error rate of 1% to 2% is that far out of line for a non-professional campaign.

But that’s too simple. Since the beginning of his candidacy the Keyes campaigners have taken as much joy in bashing Republicans, those nasty girlie men RINOs, as they do in bashing Democrats.

It’s all good fun you know.

46 posted on 10/15/2004 12:32:29 PM PDT by SJackson (They're not Americans. They're just journalists, Col George Connell, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
"Since the beginning of his candidacy the Keyes campaigners have taken as much joy in bashing Republicans, those nasty girlie men RINOs, as they do in bashing Democrats.

I wonder if the word "bashing" is maybe too strong a word. Keyes doesn't really strike me as a "Basher", although I could believe people in his campaign could be.

47 posted on 10/15/2004 12:39:54 PM PDT by OHelix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Actually it’s not such a difficult question to answer. He took in over $15 million in 2000, over $8 million from individuals. I’m not sure an error rate of 1% to 2% is that far out of line for a non-professional campaign.

You summed it up well. Better than I did, in fact. Nice job.

49 posted on 10/15/2004 12:48:33 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Defeatists Suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson