Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC May Regulate Web Political Activity
My Way News ^ | October 13, 2004 | SHARON THEIMER

Posted on 10/15/2004 1:33:44 PM PDT by 2ThumbsUp

FEC May Regulate Web Political Activity

Email this Story

Oct 13, 7:55 AM (ET)

By SHARON THEIMER

(AP) President Bush and and first lady Laura Bush leave "Richardson's Cuisine of New Mexico" restaurant... Full Image

WASHINGTON (AP) - With political fund raising, campaign advertising and organizing taking place in full swing over the Internet, it may just be a matter of time before the Federal Election Commission joins the action. Well, that time may be now.

A recent federal court ruling says the FEC must extend some of the nation's new campaign finance and spending limits to political activity on the Internet.

Long reluctant to step into online political activity, the agency is considering whether to appeal.

But vice chairwoman Ellen Weintraub said the Internet may prove to be an unavoidable area for the six-member commission, regardless of what happens with the ruling.

"I don't think anybody here wants to impede the free flow of information over the Internet," Weintraub said. "The question then is, where do you draw the line?"

This election season has been a groundbreaking one online, as interest groups, campaigns and political parties use Web sites and e-mail to advertise, organize volunteers, reach out to donors and collect information about voters.

Former Democratic presidential hopeful Howard Dean made the most pronounced splash online when he stunned his rivals by raking in tens of millions of dollars through Web-a-thons, a far cheaper fund-raising method than traditional dinners and cocktail parties. And Internet message boards, known as blogs, have become as common a place for people to air their political views as talk shows and newspaper editorial pages.

The Internet also is where political players do what they can no longer do on television or radio.

The National Rifle Association, for example, has started an online newscast and talk show to air its views on presidential and congressional candidates. The Internet is exempt from a ban on the use of corporate money for radio and TV ads targeting federal candidates close to elections, part of the new campaign finance law that took effect this election cycle.

The November Fund, an anti-trial lawyer group partly funded by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, is posting Internet ads criticizing Democratic vice presidential nominee John Edwards, a North Carolina senator and former personal-injury lawyer.

The FEC exempted such ads from the law's ban on coordination between candidates and groups that raise or spend corporate money. Last month, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly struck down the coordination exemption, ruling that it "severely undermines" the law.

Fred Wertheimer, president of the campaign watchdog group Democracy 21 and member of the legal team that successfully sued to overturn that and several other FEC rules interpreting the law, said campaign finance laws should apply to the Internet because substantial amounts of money are being spent on online at election time.

The laws may not always apply to the Internet as they would to other venues, Wertheimer said, "but by the same token the Internet cannot become a major avenue for evading and circumventing campaign finance laws on the grounds that people just want the Internet free from regulation of any kind."

Max Fose, a Republican Internet consultant who helped Arizona Sen. John McCain, a sponsor of the new campaign finance law, raise millions of dollars online for his 2000 presidential bid, is wary of the judge's ruling.

"Whenever there's something new and emerging and it's still developing, to place restrictions on it I think is going to hurt how political candidates and elected officials look to use the Internet, to not only be elected but look to get voters involved," Fose said.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041013/D85MHF6G0.html

On the Net:

Federal Election Commission: http://www.fec/gov/


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fec; internet; regulate

1 posted on 10/15/2004 1:33:45 PM PDT by 2ThumbsUp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp

They'll get my keyboard when the pry it from my cold dead fingers.


2 posted on 10/15/2004 1:35:59 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Ignorance, bigotry, envy, and gluttony are floor joists in the democratic platform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1243557/posts
3 posted on 10/15/2004 1:36:32 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Head's up!


4 posted on 10/15/2004 1:36:35 PM PDT by Bradís Gramma (If you live in B-I-G glass houses, don't throw stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp

If we were Dems, we would go public about the "chilling effect". Because we aren't, the elites will be happy.


5 posted on 10/15/2004 1:37:06 PM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp
With political fund raising, campaign advertising and organizing taking place in full swing over the Internet, it may just be a matter of time before the Federal Election Commission joins the action. Well, that time may be now.

The day that happens, my servers move overseas. The FEC is not an international law body.

This is just a move by the Leftists to assure that only pro-Leftist political speech reigns on the Internet. To hell with that. When the FEC makes so much as one inroad on the Internet, our First Amendment rights are history.

6 posted on 10/15/2004 1:37:34 PM PDT by Prime Choice (The Leftists think they can tax us into "prosperity" and regulate us into "liberty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp
Note that it's the COURTs who want this, not the FEC itself.

More proof that the underlying law is egregiously unconstitutional...

7 posted on 10/15/2004 1:37:42 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp
If Bush and Kerry, and their ilk, have their way the next campaign-finance "reform" will be the repeal of the First Amendment.

Professional politicians just hate when normal people speak out via "loopholes".

8 posted on 10/15/2004 1:37:49 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

ditto.


9 posted on 10/15/2004 1:38:44 PM PDT by badmatty (http://badmatty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
The day that happens, my servers move overseas. The FEC is not an international law body.

Exactly...

10 posted on 10/15/2004 1:38:48 PM PDT by danneskjold (All balloons, what the hell! There's nothing falling! What the f%#@ are you guys doing up there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp

Leave it to the monster we`ve created (our own government) and bureaucrats to claim providence over the WORLD wide web.


11 posted on 10/15/2004 1:39:11 PM PDT by infidel29 (Before the political left, we were ALL right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp

"A recent federal court ruling says the FEC must extend some of the nation's new campaign finance and spending limits to political activity on the Internet."

In Texas any such attempted regulation would be referred to as, "Pissin' into the wind." It will blow back in your face.

-Toonces


12 posted on 10/15/2004 1:39:39 PM PDT by Toonces T. Cat (The Token Republican in Deep South Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp
"I don't think anybody here wants to impede the free flow of information over the Internet," Weintraub said.

"... but we're going to do it anyway."

13 posted on 10/15/2004 1:40:05 PM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp

The Internet is the last bastion of free thought and free speech. Of course, they;re going after it.


14 posted on 10/15/2004 1:40:18 PM PDT by Samwise (It must be scary to be trapped in John Kerry's mind. No wonder he's nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp
Fine, I hope they are watching over their shoulders. Lines are being drawn.


15 posted on 10/15/2004 1:40:37 PM PDT by unixfox (Close the borders, problems solved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

My thought's exactly.


16 posted on 10/15/2004 1:42:15 PM PDT by RockinRight (John Kerry is the wrong candidate, for the wrong country, at the wrong time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp
"The question then is, where do you draw the line?"

That question was definitively answered the moment the 1st Amendment was ratified by the states. But since the government doesn't give a flying ___ what the Constitution says, they'll pose inane questions such as these, then do whatever the hell they want.

Anybody know of any free countries looking for immigrants?

17 posted on 10/15/2004 1:43:51 PM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: badmatty

When the make keyboards a crime only criminals will have keyboards.


18 posted on 10/15/2004 1:44:56 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Ignorance, bigotry, envy, and gluttony are floor joists in the democratic platform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I am a Life Member of the National Keyboarder's Association, NKA for short.


19 posted on 10/15/2004 1:46:06 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Ignorance, bigotry, envy, and gluttony are floor joists in the democratic platform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp

Bad idea, bad news.


20 posted on 10/15/2004 1:51:45 PM PDT by Bald Eagle777 (Death AND taxes. The Democrats offer both. VOTE BUSH/CHENEY in '04 !! www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

It's been rumored that the NKA is going to file a countersuit.


21 posted on 10/15/2004 1:52:48 PM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bald Eagle777

The last thing we need is more government bow-wows involved in the election.


22 posted on 10/15/2004 1:53:10 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

It is in the works now.


23 posted on 10/15/2004 1:56:43 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Ignorance, bigotry, envy, and gluttony are floor joists in the democratic platform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp

OK, all you unemployed ITers that had your jobs outsourced, here's your big chance. Start making plans for when the FEC starts supressing political discussion on the 'net. Offshore server farms will be needed. Secure forms of communications, networks controlled from offshore platforms, etc. The possibilities are endless. Think how much money PACs and Corps will be willing to spend to get around the FEC "rules."

We really need some form of high speed data channel, probably satellite, that can be received and plugged into the 'net from multiple, clandestine locations. Anyone have any ideas how to do this? (But if you tell us, they probably won't be any good anymore.)


24 posted on 10/15/2004 1:57:50 PM PDT by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp
The problem I see here is that whatever the FEC or the FCC try to do it will fail. The Internet is almost something that cannot be regulated by any person or group. As soon as some bright person or persons try to invent software to stifle to flow of information some group of 16 year old overachievers will write programs to get around it.
The Old Media, etc. cannot and will not be able to stop or slow down the Internet and that is driving them all crazy.
All these Government Agencies will find it next to impossible to try and regulate the content of the Internet.
25 posted on 10/15/2004 2:00:23 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy

Great. That will be as effective as the regulation of pornography on the web.


26 posted on 10/15/2004 2:03:59 PM PDT by jimfree (Cleveland rocks! (My venue for 72 hours in Ohio))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

You're not kidding.


27 posted on 10/15/2004 2:12:54 PM PDT by Bald Eagle777 (Death AND taxes. The Democrats offer both. VOTE BUSH/CHENEY in '04 !! www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Not sure I understand how having your server overseas, while still publishing to it from within the U.S. would help at all here... I mean, you'd still be breaking the law in the U.S. if this were to come to fruition, because you'd be authoring from within the U.S., and likely that would fall under the premise of this (Machiavellian/Draconian/whatever you'd like to call it) law being proposed.

Seems to me this would be one of those little known portions of the law that they'd like people to feel safe about infringing, then they'd nail people for the technicality.
28 posted on 10/15/2004 2:16:30 PM PDT by jurroppi1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

I know porn when I see it!


29 posted on 10/15/2004 2:17:43 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Ignorance, bigotry, envy, and gluttony are floor joists in the democratic platform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ThumbsUp

If there server is offshore what can they do about it?
Clamp down on the source like they do in China? These BureauFarts will have more on their hands if they try that.


30 posted on 10/15/2004 2:19:08 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson