Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nader loses ballot appeal in Arizona
Arizona Daily Star ^

Posted on 10/15/2004 3:00:09 PM PDT by Kokojmudd

PHOENIX - A federal appeals court on Friday rejected independent candidate Ralph Nader's bid to appear on Arizona's ballot.

The ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals came two weeks after early voting for the Nov. 2 presidential election had begun in Arizona.

Nader attorney Robert E. Barnes said it's unlikely that the campaign would appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Nader had filed a lawsuit in mid-August alleging the state's requirements for third-party candidates are unconstitutional.

A federal judge had denied his request to appear on the ballot and refused to give Nader another chance to gather signatures to compete in Arizona.

Earlier in the summer, Nader supporters had submitted signatures to qualify the consumer advocate for Arizona's ballot. But they abandoned their effort after Democrats questioned the validity of the independent candidate's nominating petitions.

Many Democrats blame Nader, a Green Party candidate four years ago, for taking away liberal votes from Democrat Al Gore and helping ensure President Bush's victory.

Nader didn't take away enough votes from Gore to overcome Bush's lead in Arizona. Even if Nader's 45,000 votes had gone to Gore, Bush would have still beaten the Democratic nominee by 50,000 votes here.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ballotaccess; nader

1 posted on 10/15/2004 3:00:09 PM PDT by Kokojmudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd

Who cares? It's not like Arizona is in play.


2 posted on 10/15/2004 3:02:46 PM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz

I'm just wondering, what drives this man? I mean, what is Nader trying to accomplish? I don't see it. He is the chronic presidential candidate. I would think he'd get a little tired of all this.


3 posted on 10/15/2004 3:04:01 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd

Somebody explain to me what difference it makes if you're on the ballot, or not. Aren't write-ins allowed in every state? It can't be an arguement of legitimacy when you're only expected to pull 1-3 percent, anyway.


4 posted on 10/15/2004 3:05:05 PM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd
The 9th U.S. Circuit strikes again.
5 posted on 10/15/2004 3:06:49 PM PDT by demlosers ( ONI: “Lieutenant Kerry wasn’t cleared to know what time it was!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd

It doesn't matter, anyway. AZ is in the president's pocket I am proud to say.


6 posted on 10/15/2004 3:09:33 PM PDT by broadsword (Weren't there a couple of giant Buddhist statues in Afghanistan? What happened to them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Believe me, most Nader supporters are far too stupid to remember write-in.


7 posted on 10/15/2004 4:02:20 PM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson