Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mississippi Paper Breaks News of Army Reservists Refusing Dangerous Iraq Mission
AP ^ | October 15, 2004 | AP

Posted on 10/15/2004 3:42:48 PM PDT by Former Military Chick

WASHINGTON (AP) The Army is investigating reports that several members of a reservist supply unit in Iraq refused to go on a convoy mission, the military said Friday. Relatives of the soldiers said the troops considered the mission too dangerous, according to a report in The Clarion-Ledger of Jackson, Miss.

The reservists are from the 343rd Quartermaster Company, which is based in Rock Hill, S.C. The unit delivers food and water in combat zones.

A platoon of 17 soldiers refused to go on a fuel supply mission Wednesday because their vehicles were in poor shape and they did not have a capable armed escort, the Clarion-Ledger reported.

The paper cited interviews with family members of some of the soldiers, who said the soldiers had been confined after their refusals. The mission was carried out by other soldiers from the 343rd, which has at least 120 soldiers, the military said.

Convoys in Iraq are frequently subject to ambushes and roadside bombings.

A whole unit refusing to go on a mission in a war zone would be a significant breach of military discipline. A statement from the military's press center in Baghdad called the incident "isolated."

"The investigating team is currently in Tallil taking statements and interviewing those involved. This is an isolated incident and it is far too early in the investigation to speculate as to what happened, why it happened or any action that might be taken," the coalition press information center said in the statement, sent to The Associated Press in Washington.

In the statement, U.S. military officials said the commanding general of the 13th Corps Support Command had appointed his deputy commander to investigate the incident.

The statement did not confirm several aspects of the relatives' stories, including the number of soldiers involved and the reason they refused the mission.

The soldiers refused an order on Wednesday to go to Taji, Iraq -- north of Baghdad -- because their vehicles were considered extremely unsafe, Patricia McCook of Jackson, Miss., told the Clarion-Ledger. Her husband, Sgt. Larry O. McCook, was among those detained, she said, saying her husband had telephoned her from Iraq.

The platoon being held has troops from Alabama, Kentucky, North Carolina, Mississippi, and South Carolina, said Teresa Hill of Dothan, Ala., who told the newspaper her daughter Amber McClenny is among those being detained.

Patricia McCook said her husband told her he did not feel comfortable taking his soldiers on another trip.

"He told me that three of the vehicles they were to use were 'deadlines' ... not safe to go in a hotbed like that," she said, according to the newspaper.

---------------------------------------------------------

Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; taji
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Platoon defies orders in Iraq-Miss. soldier calls home, cites safety concerns
1 posted on 10/15/2004 3:42:49 PM PDT by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
You just can't let soldiers refuse a legal order in wartime.

Also note that one of the soldiers involved was asking about the penalty for assaulting his CO some time earlier.

SO9

2 posted on 10/15/2004 3:48:24 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Screwing the Inscrutable or is it Scruting the Inscrewable?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Patricia McCook said her husband told her he did not feel comfortable taking his soldiers on another trip

As the story has only been reported from these men/women and their families I will only state the following!

Part of the 20% of our service men that think they will get a better shake from JFnK. LOL!

3 posted on 10/15/2004 3:48:53 PM PDT by rocksblues (Sorry John, we remember and will never forget your treason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
"They are holding us against our will," McClenny said. "We are now prisoners."
Go figure-- they put you in the brig for disobeying orders. who'da thunk it?
4 posted on 10/15/2004 3:50:07 PM PDT by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

IG should look into their concerns and if their vehicles and security is as bad as they say
its time to relieve some commanders

imo


5 posted on 10/15/2004 3:52:05 PM PDT by joesnuffy (America needs a 'Big Dog' on her porch not a easily frightened, whining, Surrender Poodle...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
because their vehicles were in poor shape

Wasn't this the equipment they were supposed to get with the $87 Billion Kerry voted against?

6 posted on 10/15/2004 3:56:00 PM PDT by Peter vE (Ceterum censeo: delenda est Carthago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy

Here is my cut. What if this resupply not getting there endagered others lives. I mean it is WAR. Get in, get going, and if need be ..GET SOME!

Drive the vehicles until they dont go anymore. Then call in for support.

WTF. I guess I should wait for the full story but it dont look good for the soldiers who didn't follow orders


7 posted on 10/15/2004 3:57:08 PM PDT by BookaT (My Cat's Breath smells like Cat Food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Looking like it's time for a serious investigation starting with the higher ranks, as to just who is not doing their job.


8 posted on 10/15/2004 3:59:04 PM PDT by B4Ranch (´´Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are our teeth for Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Would you want these folks watching your back?


9 posted on 10/15/2004 4:00:20 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Military service is not your highschools letterman club. There was a job to do, they refused to do it, and then somebodyelse had to do it. Then they whine that they are prisoners. They will be coming back to the US in a short time for an all expenses paid stay in the luxurious Hotel Leavenworth.
10 posted on 10/15/2004 4:04:17 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 (I volunteer to instruct JFK on the meaning of a purple heart!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

My husband (my favorite career military person) and I had a long discussion about this and it sounds fishy. When I told him it was reservists he said "what a surprise" He was being sarcastic. And then dismissed it as another reservist gaffe. I'm not being critical of reservists, but almost all problems seems to be with reservists.(Abu ghraib, the pilots who bombed canadian soldiers in an exercise in Afgh.) Lack of training? Why didn't the ranking member take it up the change of command if he was concerned for his troops safety. Did he not know that was proper procedure? did they just flat out refuse a direct order? Hubby said the Army is very careful about that stuff and wouldn't have sent them on a "suicide" mission. I think there may be more to this story.


11 posted on 10/15/2004 4:08:01 PM PDT by linda11567
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Never fear U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson(D-MS) is handling this. I suspect another attempted slap at e Bush administration.
12 posted on 10/15/2004 4:10:19 PM PDT by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick; All

This is bad news, especially this close to the election. Look for Lurch and the girl to seize on it.


13 posted on 10/15/2004 4:12:03 PM PDT by AmarilloMorning
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

If the order was lawful, then they go to the stockade. End of story.


14 posted on 10/15/2004 4:12:24 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Always ask yourself, does this pass the Global Test?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linda11567
I think there may be more to this story.

I think is is politically motivated considering Bennie Thompson is on the case. I'd just as soon trust Cynthis McKinna.

15 posted on 10/15/2004 4:13:26 PM PDT by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: oyez

"They knew there was a 99 percent chance they were going to get ambushed or fired at," Hill said her daughter told her. "They would have had no way to fight back."


Sure there is, use your M-16.


16 posted on 10/15/2004 4:17:02 PM PDT by bannedfromdu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick


"They are holding us against our will," McClenny said. "We are now prisoners."
This statement from the article is instructive. What does this fellow think happens if one refuses a lawful order? I can't imagine that anyone would expect equipment in a war zone to be in stateside condition.


17 posted on 10/15/2004 4:22:36 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
This stinks of politically motivated hijinks to me. The left is pulling out all of the stops.
18 posted on 10/15/2004 4:23:42 PM PDT by ladyinred (The simple lie always conquers the more complex truth. (propaganda))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691
Exactly. I bet the unit tries their best at being fair about rotating which unit goes in. And since they refused another unit, probably just getting back has to go back out. If i was in that unit i would be ripping!

I would be even more PO'd if i was the guys out in the field and didn't have any fuel for our vehicles!

19 posted on 10/15/2004 4:24:44 PM PDT by chudogg (www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AmarilloMorning
Troll Alert
20 posted on 10/15/2004 4:29:00 PM PDT by LuigiBasco (It's LONG past time to restart The Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson