Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[UK] Territorial Army Infiltrated by Al Qaeda
UK Times ^ | October 17, 2004 | David Leppard

Posted on 10/17/2004 6:35:46 PM PDT by gopwinsin04

The Territorial Army has been inflitrated by Al Qaeda suspects, giving the Islamic terrorist group potential access to military bases, explosives and fuel dumps.

Five Al Qaeda suspects are believe to have trained as part time soldiers in the TA. As least one is now is custody.

The Ministry of Defence has confirmed that other terror suspects have attempted to join the TA, but said that they were rejected after undergoing security checks.

The connection with Britain's Al Qaeda network was uncovered in a series of wide ranging investigations by MI5 and Scotland Yard's Special Branch.

It is believed that terrorist suspects may have been taking advantage of military training as well as gaining access to bases and weapons.

The arrest followed a tip-off from Pakistan, although details of the case cannot be reported for legal reasons.

Recently acquired intelligence suggests that the group has been planning a 'spectacular' attack, possibly using car bombs against high rise office blocks in the City of London.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: napalminthemorning; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
This is something like the National Guard in the states, correct?
1 posted on 10/17/2004 6:35:47 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

spin spin spin


2 posted on 10/17/2004 6:38:31 PM PDT by Gibtx (Pajamahadien call to arms.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Pakistan does it again.


3 posted on 10/17/2004 6:39:30 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Any background on the TA we should know?


4 posted on 10/17/2004 6:40:47 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

No surprises there. But, notice it has been caught and the security checks have already eliminated some of the attempts. This indicates to me that at least some of the system is working. Remember, it's better than the military in Iraq 2 years ago.


5 posted on 10/17/2004 6:41:27 PM PDT by Wneighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

I betcha these boys dont 'look Muslim' in any way shape or form...


6 posted on 10/17/2004 6:42:20 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

England, Sweden and soon the U.S. will realize what a mistake it was to essentially open the borders.


7 posted on 10/17/2004 6:43:20 PM PDT by CurlyBill (Voter Fraud is one of the primary campaign strategies of the Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wneighbor

Sounds like 4 of these UK suspects are still at large to me..


8 posted on 10/17/2004 6:43:41 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

I'm really hope they catch them soon before they start blowing thing up!!


9 posted on 10/17/2004 6:44:10 PM PDT by prophetic (What do u call someone who flip-flops so much? A Politician? No, a HYPOCRITE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Ivan,

Bump for input.


10 posted on 10/17/2004 6:44:42 PM PDT by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

I was getting the impression that they knew who the other 4 were and were about to deal with them as well. I could be wrong there, I couldn't get to the link on the article and just read the info posted.


11 posted on 10/17/2004 6:51:43 PM PDT by Wneighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

This is a daring MO, now the Islamokazis are joining the UK National Guard as sleepers?


12 posted on 10/17/2004 6:52:16 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wneighbor

Mods put up the correct link now, I typed in the second page of the addy instead of the first..


13 posted on 10/17/2004 6:53:47 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
Nothing new here,....move on.....

('1984' Winston's England 101)

?.....Church bells to ring?)

/mosques

14 posted on 10/17/2004 6:57:57 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Got it, read the article. My first understanding was completely off base. oops.


15 posted on 10/17/2004 7:00:05 PM PDT by Wneighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

That is correct, for TAVR read NG. My daughter is currently serving in the TAVR in Basrah and my son is in the LA NG in Baghdad.

They had to apply for special permission to meet, my son cannot shop in the British NAAFI(Px) and my daughter cannot shop at the US Px. It is such stupid petty rules that seperate
the forces.


16 posted on 10/17/2004 7:10:37 PM PDT by ijcr (Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; StillProud2BeFree; Alabama MOM; Velveeta; Revel; DAVEY CROCKETT; Donna Lee Nardo; ...

Ping


17 posted on 10/17/2004 8:47:12 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (On this day your Prayers are needed!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Not to quibble too much, but the newspaper is the London Times, not the UK Times. The London Times is even more full of itself than the New York Times, so they don't always even bother to say London when identifying themselves.

Thanks for the post, by the way.


18 posted on 10/18/2004 3:25:45 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
Not to quibble too much, but the newspaper is the London Times, not the UK Times. The London Times is even more full of itself than the New York Times, so they don't always even bother to say London when identifying themselves.

That's because its name is The Times, not the "London Times".

19 posted on 10/18/2004 4:40:58 AM PDT by Haymarket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04
Here is the TA's home page:

http://www.ta.mod.uk/

20 posted on 10/18/2004 4:52:02 AM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson