Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: qam1
it’s difficult to argue that they’re medically necessary

Why is it so easy to dismiss someone else's sex life as not "medically necessary"?

I wonder what would the attitude would be if the author's sex life depended on Viagra?

For most of history amputees got along fine without prosthetic arms & legs, or with very primitive ones. Should Medicare only cover a single hook for a hand prosthesis?

11 posted on 10/18/2004 8:51:47 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CurlyDave

Contrary to the line my high-school boyfriend tried on me...you will not DIE if you don't "get any."


12 posted on 10/18/2004 11:16:24 AM PDT by Malacoda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: CurlyDave
For most of history amputees got along fine without prosthetic arms & legs, or with very primitive ones. Should Medicare only cover a single hook for a hand prosthesis?

Why stop there? How about free liposuction, Rhinoplasty, etc. for all medicare recipients? Having a big fat gut or big ugly snoze can make the possibility of healthly sex life beyond the ability for even Viagra to help.

If I going to pay for anyone to have sex, it's going to be for myself.

18 posted on 10/19/2004 6:50:11 PM PDT by qam1 (McGreevy likes his butts his way, I like mine my way - so NO SMOKING BANS in New Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson