Posted on 10/18/2004 11:50:31 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
Tuesday, October 19, 2004
By Joseph Farah
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
What is John Kerry for?
I know it's a simple question – some would even say "simplistic."
It's easy to know what the candidate of nuance is against, but, really, what is he for?
Clearly he is against everything George W. Bush does and says.
That's easy. But let's really try to figure out what makes Kerry tick and where he would take the nation.
I think I've figured it out – based on 31 years of observing this man.
Kerry is for chaos.
Kerry believes the only way he can become president is to confuse people – and he's doing an excellent job.
He knows the only way he can become president is to lie, deceive and cheat – and he's stepping up the campaign of deception and fraud.
How is he doing this? What is my evidence?
I think this is going to be a very ugly Election Day – unless it is some kind of landslide. The aftermath of a close election in 2004 could be worse and more confusing than the 2000 vote. I doubt very much if Kerry will bow out gracefully no matter what the courts rule.
Kerry sees this as war – his one and only chance at the brass ring.
Kerry doesn't mind if America is humiliated before the whole world for its inability to conduct a free and fair election. The only thing that matters to Kerry is victory.
This is going to be a dirty, dirty campaign and the only thing that can save our nation from the divisiveness and chaos that will result is a real Election Day spanking for Kerry.
I know there is a lot of resentment toward President Bush. I understand that. As I have repeatedly said since the beginning of the campaign, I cannot vote for President Bush because he fails the basic test of upholding constitutional principles.
But I am urging any one considering voting for John Kerry to put your country first. Kerry would be poison for this country. Even a close vote Nov. 2 could spell more division for our nation – division we cannot afford as our enemies plot their next move against us.
We cannot afford Kerry's hare-brained ideas – like his proposal for providing the terrorists in Iran with the nuclear fuel they want as a way of testing their intentions to build nuclear weapons.
Chaos. That's what Kerry wants. It's his only chance of winning. It's his only chance of deceiving his way into power. And that's just what we will have with Kerry in the White House.
I don't think it will be close. Even with the vote fraud.
Bush has a good chance for taking new jersey. I think he even has a chance at new york, although the polls don't hold up with that.
I think when it comes down to it, when it matters, people walking into the voting booth are going in NJ and possibly NY are going to vote for the guy who has been kicking terrorist butt for the past 3 years.
I would certainly love to see dan rather's face when those results come in.
If its not close they will still try to steal it
They will still try to steal it. Could be violence.
While he has Kerry's intentions down, he is part of the problem and not the solution obviously.
I know they will try to steel it. But there's only so much they can do if a majority of voters reject john kerry.
As far as violence on their part goes, it's probably a dumb idea, 'cuz we're the ones with the guns.
Bush has a good chance for taking new jersey. I think he even has a chance at new york, although the polls don't hold up with that.
I "heard" that if the election results don't match the polls, then the dems are going to cry "foul!". So now I guess national elections are going to the courts according to "polls". What a sad place we have come to.
Well Joseph .. it would be better if you put your money where your mouth is. If Kerry would be a disaster for America, then certainly Bush would be a better alternative. Given what's at stake, how can anyone NOT VOTE.
Hey, Joe, the rest is crap.
Hugh Hewitt's gem.
#8 -- my sentiments exactly.
One poll has the race dead-even. Lurch's in big trouble in the Garden State.
Depends what we mean by 'landslide.'
I have been expecting Bush to win 325 EVs, +/- 25 EVs, for several weeks now. So if we work with the 325 figure, the spread will be B 325 to K 213.
That's a lot of states that Kerry would have to sucessfully challenge for in order to get his 270 EVs. I can see one state being cloe, but in the above scenario, no one Bush state will make the difference (that is, Bush isn't expected to closely win any single state that will give him 50+ EVs).
So to me, the dems problems compound with the more places they challenge. They will come off as bitter and nutty losers if they face the american public and say 'there was voter intimidation in these two states, black disenfranchisement in this one state, etc etc.'
I really don't think the public will have much of an appetite for John Kerry after the election. If he sticks around for weeks arguing for the deep constitutional need for recounts and legal challenges in a half dozen states, especially when he loses the popular vote by a few points, he will be doing both himself and the dems a great disservice.
Otherwise, maybe instead of conceding on election night, he will declare himself the 'real winner'and then we can have another civil war.
After all, the last civil war worked out so well...
If anything, I predict Ohio will be the controversial state this time around. They really seem to be ramping things up there. Besides the cocaine story, we had that Kerry spokesman basically saying they're going to keep counting until Kerry wins Ohio, and I believe several of those "registered 45 times" stories are coming out of Ohio.
Based on stories I've seen, it looks like the Dems in Milwaukee are planning on casting three times as many ballots for Kerry as there are registered voters in the city. That's a lot of bogus votes.
These guys are very bold. They got away with so much fraud in 2000 and still had the media trotting out their line of voter intimidation.
I'm betting we'll see turnout to the tune of 115% in Detroit, 105% in certain parts of Philly, 120+% in Cleveland, maybe 300% in Milwaukee. It's going to be unreal.
I think there are really two things working against an extended litigation of the presidential election.
1: JFnK himself. If the results are clear, why spend campaign funds on a legal challenge? Just go back to sponging off your wife for the rest of your life.
2. Clinton control of the DNC. This is the biggie. I think they're talking a good game right now, but if kerry loses, the powers that be at the DNC (the clintonites) will probably just believe it's "for the best" because this will allow hillary to run for president in 2008.
I really don't see lurch winning this. The country is at war and even if people don't like it, the majority of them aren't going to switch presidents when the country can't afford an anti-war liberal at the helm.
The Dims know full well that THEY are the cheaters, but they will put the nation through hell just out of spite and hatred.
Absolutely agree, how can anyone not vote? This is reality, people need to count the costs of sitting back and not participating, we are fighting for our survival!
Dont you just love hypocrits?
I'm so sick of the "Dont do as I do..do as I say mentality"
Joseph Farah makes a powerful argument of why we should not elect the slimeball rat bastard traitor, and why chaos would not be good for this country, but then goes on to say he won't vote for Bush but we should. Does that make any sense to you?
Joe.. if you love the constitution. If you love this country. If you believe in the words you speak, vote for Bush. Every vote counts. We can make this a landslide if we can get all the hypocrits on board.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.