Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62
So is it 'offshore' or 'in house' projects that do better?  The article says that by offshoring "the average saving was found to be less than 10 per cent".  Does that mean that we need a price difference greater than 10 percent before we switch?
10 posted on 10/19/2004 11:06:26 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: expat_panama

Good question. I think all important software projects should be done inhouse or with a trusted vendor. Failure for software projects is a subjective term. I think something like 90% slip dates. Some projects are doomed from the start. An executive wants it done, or some company is willing to pay a vendor, the reason being internal political reasons even though they know it's not going to work.. I imagine many of these are offshored. If a project is going to fail you want it done at the cheapest price, right?


11 posted on 10/19/2004 11:37:01 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Federal Creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson