Posted on 10/19/2004 5:14:54 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
As I drove down 5th street yesterday, I spied a bumper sticker that addresses an issue I have been waiting for an excuse to write about. It was in the back window of a pickup truck, whose ability to operate I found simply amazing, strategically situated between an empty gun rack and another sticker depicting Calvin (of Calvin and Hobbes fame) urinating on "Osama" with a devilish grin on his face.
I will leave the "Osama" reference and defamation of an innocent newspaper comic strip character alone for the purposes of this article, and will concentrate on the content of the other bumper sticker. It was a simple, Confederate flag, next to which was written the words, "Heritage not Hate". Now, if I have ever read something more deserving of one of my diatribes, I cannot recall.
This statement, which for the record I believe to be sheer nonsense, speaks of an issue with which I had very limited experience before relocating to North Carolina, but an issue of importance nonetheless.
All my life, the Confederate flag was something of a joke to me. M history classes in high school and earlier had taught me that the Confederate defeat during the Civil War was a good thing, that the moral argument against slavery (espoused by the Lincoln government in Washington) was a black and white issue, about right and wrong, and that the Union triumph is 1865 was righteous.
Granted, the history I was taught spoke from a biased perspective, from the moral high ground of the abolitionists and northern intellectuals, and never really addressed the true, underlying reasons for the Civil War, which I would come to learn much later. After considering all the information I have been able to locate on the subject, after long hours of trying to understand just where the Confederacy was coming from and why they wanted to defend their way of life, I have come to a few conclusions.
Naturally, these conclusions reflect my upbringing and Northern perspective, and I am more than confident than my loyal readers will have more than a few comments of their own to contribute.
First of all, "Heritage not Hate", is an extreme cop out. Sure, the Confederate flag, displayed in the year 2004, some 140 years after the actual conflict ended, may stand for some long forgotten Southern pride issue. It may stand for the struggles that people in the Southeastern region of the United States suffered through and the wars that they fought.
It may stand for some perceived difference between the North and South, which apparently has persisted to this day, and may fondly recall the era of Southern dominance of the United States.
Woops, little mistake there. The South has never "dominated" anything. It is another region within the greater whole, just as it was then and remains so today. As for the "Not Hate" part of the bumper sticker, a more laughable statement I cannot recall. There are far too many damning coincidences that will forever relegate the Stars and Bars to the level of racist propaganda.
Why is it that hate groups all over the country, to this day, fly the Confederate flag as a symbol of their ideology. White Supremacist organizations,
, the sad, pitiful remnants of the Klu Klux Klan, along with many other neo-Nazi and racially motivated groups all include the Confederate flag amongst their symbols of worship.
Is this coincidence? Are people who fly the Confederate flag, be it in bumper sticker form or on the end of a flagpole, trying to align themselves with such openly evil and backward-thinking organizations? I don't think so. I think that people fly the flag to recall the once glorious Confederated states of America and celebrate their history, while at the same time somehow overlooking the racial implications inherent in the very symbol they hold so high.
Make no mistake. Whether you choose to recognize it or not, the fact remains the same: The Confederate flag is a racist symbol. It was during the Civil War, it remains so today. I challenge anyone to show me an African-American person with a Confederate Flag bumper sticker or "The South will rise again" written in their computers screensaver.
Is this a coincidence? You would sooner find a swastika flying outside the Israel embassy as you would a Confederate flag flying at an N.A.A.C.P rally. To me, the symbols have long been morally relative to each other. Both stand for hate, oppression, and the wanton murder and destruction of a group of people because of some perceived inferiorities. Plantation owners in the South, before and during the Civil War, treated slaves the same way they treated horses and sheep.
They were not human beings, quite the contrary. They could be bought and sold like farm equipment and with as much compassion. So to during the Nazi era in Germany; Jews were not considered people in the same way that German citizens were, therefore their wholesale murder could be justified. Anyone who cannot see the glaring similarities between the Confederate flag and the Swastika needs to pick up a history book and do some research.
If you care to display a symbol that represents the brutality and viciousness and lack of humanity that was involved in something like the slave trade, as the Confederate flag clearly does, you are entitled. The first Amendment to the Constitution allows you the freedom to display just about whatever you care to, but consider this. If you are going to fly the Stars and Bars, don't sugar coat it. Don't downplay the racial aspects and idealize the cultural aspects. They are one in the same.
Be up front and honest about your feelings. Confederacy= Hate I think would be a far more realistic bumper sticker, and as we speak I am in negotiations to have a number of said bumper stickers produced. Let us just call a spade a spade and forget about the "Heritage not Hate" nonsense. It is hateful, you know it is, and beating around the bush about it only takes away from the power of the argument. Let the responsive mud slinging commence!
Sarah Debro was a slave in North Carolina. There were rail connections to Vicksburg.
No, because in that case, unlike the claims you made, the judicial process found him guilty. When the Supreme Court has ruled on your claims, let me know. If they say you're right then I'll agree with your interpretation.
Why would I want to be standing in the embers of my house?
Because someone who didn't like you declared you to be in "rebellion" and burned it down around you.
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=mesn&fileName=111/mesn111.db&recNum=364&itemLink=S?ammem/mesnbib:@field(AUTHOR+@od1(Hall,+Thomas))
Your ad verecundiam groveling is incredibly non-American and bovine. If I can wangle an appointment to the Supremes, will you kiss whatever I tell you to?
LOL! -- You just insisted that every historian in the world prove his theses in court! World history has to come to a grinding halt while Non-Sequitur demands injunctive relief from the processes of human reason!
Simultaneously, you just told us that the truth is whatever the Supreme Court says it is.
"Plessey vs. Ferguson". "Dred Scott". Write those 500 times each on a blackboard.
If someone like you can get onto the Supreme Court then hell yes.
No, just ones like you who demand that the world agree with them because...well, because they say so.
Simultaneously, you just told us that the truth is whatever the Supreme Court says it is.
No, but the Supreme Court is tasked with ruling on what is Constitutional and what is not. Not you.
If I was in rebellion then I'd have little to complain about, wouldn't I?
I certainly do give a dam about what you think after your remarks.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Besides ending slavery what were other spoils of a northern victory?
Land and resources that northern businessmen had longed to get their hands on before the war. Sort of like going to war for oil! Do you think that even back then the northern states would have supported a war simply to gain resources? But alas the slavery issue was good enough to get them fired up. I could go on and on about the different economic reasons for the war but it took me a few years to digest it all.
But let's jump ahead to another BIG issue for going to war, STATES RIGHTS! The right for states to make their own decisions. Guess what X, slavery was on the way out by the time the war started. But the south DID NOT WANT to be told what to do and when to do it. Sort of like the conflict going on today with states wanting to decide for themselves on same-sex marriage.
I guess on that issue liberals can be compared to the Civil War Rebels in telling the Gov't to butt out of their business!
complaining about such silliness as whether the spell-checker on FR works OR whether you like my grammar/punctuation/etc. is a sign that you have a vacuum between your ears. that is typical of IGNORANT HATERS, who have NOTHING of importance to say!
why not head over to DU with the other fools/cretins/damnyankee southHATERS. they will really LIKE YOU!
free dixie,sw
must be his "pubic screwl edumakashun".
free dixie,sw
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.