Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HassanBenSobar

The embryos used in research are not suffering in the slightest, but that doesn't seem to make any difference to the anti-stem cell research extremists.


30 posted on 10/20/2004 11:21:58 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker (Donate to the Swift Vets -- www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: All
Shill Michael J. Fox and his campaign contributions
32 posted on 10/20/2004 11:24:15 AM PDT by john_virtue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker
The embryos used in research are not suffering in the slightest, but that doesn't seem to make any difference to the anti-stem cell research extremists.

Here let me fix that for you: The embryos infants used in research are not suffering in the slightest, but that doesn't seem to make any difference to the anti-stem cell research extremists. To change the name to make something more palatable is very common, to desensitize people to what is actually taking place.

39 posted on 10/20/2004 11:38:31 AM PDT by MontanaBeth (NEVER FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker
"The embryos used in research are not suffering in the slightest, but that doesn't seem to make any difference to the anti-stem cell research extremists."

You know, you're right.

And I guess, using your logic, it would be OK to take comatose people who are going to die anyway and use them for experiments for new techniques on curing diseases.

Comatose people aren't suffering in the slightest.

66 posted on 10/20/2004 1:12:05 PM PDT by chs68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker
"The embryos used in research are not suffering in the slightest."

And you know this how? Or is just that your suffering is of greater value? And the goal of those that support stem cell research is to use stem cells from aborted babies. They do suffer, that is a fact, but again your tragedy and suffering justify ripping a baby apart while it is alive. Wouldn't it be ironic if the person who would have found the cure for PD was murdered in an abortion.
74 posted on 10/20/2004 1:43:21 PM PDT by MPJackal ("If you are not with us, you are against us." That includes demonrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker

What we are against, is the forcable rape of our values and morals by other people who do not share them. You may argue all day and all night for this type of research. I say, go ahead and do it. Just don't take the money out of my wallet to do it! There are no laws which forbid it. Take your argument to other people like Oprah and Ted Turner. They have much more money than I do. Why not yell at them, because they are not financing this "research". They don't have a problem with it. I do. Leave me and my money alone.


160 posted on 10/24/2004 12:10:47 AM PDT by tuckrdout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker
The embryos used in research are not suffering in the slightest, but that doesn't seem to make any difference to the anti-stem cell research extremists.

I'm sure that if you killed a five-year-old with an overdose of general anesthetic, you could say he suffered not in the least, either, but you still killed him. Likewise, embryonic stem cell research (painlessly) kills a human being at an earlier stage of life.

The problem with doing embryonic stem cell research is that it might encourage people to advocate sacrificing human beings at other stages of life for research.

There is an ethical alternative: adult stem cell research.

208 posted on 10/26/2004 10:57:06 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport 'em all; let Fox sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson