Rather than replying with an ad hominem attack, refute it with a well-defended view.
Typical libertarian idiocy.
Since the dawn of human history government has been part of marriage either as clan, tribe, tradition, or as the state because it is of the utmost importance to the health and moral tone of civil society. Since people no longer live lives in which anti-social behavior is held in check by fear of ostracism or disgrace from clan, tribe, tradition, or "what the neighbors will say" (the only circumstances under which a libertarian society could ever work) they look to government to enforce the societal consensus. This is because it has always been a matter of extreme public interest to see to it that women and children are looked after.
As we see from Europe, a society in which sodomy has won is a pagan, hedonistic, barbaric one in which marriage collapses completely and the birthrate drops below the replacement rate. You cannot have civilization in the absence of a state committed to enforcing codes of civilized behavior. That means Judeo-Christian morality because, frankly, the alternatives just don't work.
I believe sardines should be able to bring civil suits against sharks and their co-conspirators, dolphins...will you please validate my POV?
Everyone, except Libertarians, knows that society has a right and a duty to promote those morals and ceremonies that enhance a societies ability to survive. Without that, there is chaos and anarchy.