Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fedora

"I prefer to start with data that can be established independently of what defectors allege."

Golitsyn let it all hang out when he made those predictions. They were designed to be independently verified. That's why Riebling researched them. His conclusion? 94% of Golitsyn's predictions came to pass (whereas, every other Soviet analyst was completely taken by surprise). Indeed, his prediction about the effect this would have on the EU, NATO and the US are unfolding before our very eyes.

Did you read Golitsyn's books for yourself? If not, the summary of Golitsyn's predictions and analysis I posted above is a good place to start.


51 posted on 10/23/2004 5:52:08 PM PDT by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: TapTheSource

"That's why Riebling researched them. His conclusion? 94% of Golitsyn's predictions came to pass"

I've read Riebling pretty closely and while his work is useful I find flaws in his arguments in a number of places and I disagree with a number of things he says.

Regarding Golitsyn's predictions coming true, keep in mind that a disinformation agent is going to say some things that are true--usually giveaway information which is already known--in order to make the rest of his story seem plausible.

Thanks for the references on Golitsyn. I will check that out when I get a chance.


53 posted on 10/23/2004 6:03:29 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson