Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OESY

Is it as important as it was to make sure George Sr. could pick someone like David Souter? How about Reagan with Kennedy or O'Connor? Or Gerald Ford to select John Paul Stevens?

Just because the President has an "R" next to his name doesn't necessarily mean a strict constructionist will be nominated to the high court.


8 posted on 10/22/2004 11:54:31 AM PDT by Beemnseven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Beemnseven
Just because the President has an "R" next to his name doesn't necessarily mean a strict constructionist will be nominated to the high court.

True, but what is your alternative? For although many Republican Supreme Court picks -- Blackmun, Souter, Stevens -- turn out to be liberal or far-left, when was the last time a Democratic President's pick ended up being disappointingly "Republican" in his judgments once sworn in? (Clinton's picks Breyer and particularly Ginsburg have been reliable liberals.)

9 posted on 10/22/2004 12:06:47 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson