Posted on 10/23/2004 8:43:29 PM PDT by no dems
Ohio Provisional Ballot Ruling Reversed
7 minutes ago
By JOE KAY, Associated Press Writer
CINCINNATI - A federal appeals court ruled Saturday that provisional ballots Ohio voters cast outside their own precincts should not be counted, throwing out a lower-court decision that said such ballots are valid as long as they are cast in the correct county.
The ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites) supports an order issued by Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell. Democrats contend the Republican official's rules are too restrictive and allege they are intended to suppress the vote.
Ohio Democrats on Saturday night decided not to file an appeal in the case, one of the first major tests of how such ballots will be handled in a close election. Polls show that the race between President Bush (news - web sites) and Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites) in the key swing state is too close to call.
Federal judges in several states have issued varying rulings on the issue of provisional ballots, which are intended to be backups for eligible voters whose names do not appear on the rolls. Saturday's ruling was the first time a federal appeals court has weighed in.
The state's Democrats had filed a lawsuit challenging Blackwell's directive instructing county elections boards not to give ballots to voters who come to the wrong precinct and to send them to the correct polling place on Election Day.
Blackwell has said allowing voters to cast a ballot wherever they show up, even if they're not registered to vote there, is a recipe for Election Day chaos.
The Ohio Democratic Party and a coalition of labor and voter rights groups had argued that Blackwell's order discriminated against the poor and minorities, who tend to move more frequently.
U.S. District Judge James Carr on Oct. 14 blocked Blackwell's directive, ruling that Ohio voters who show up at the wrong polling place still can cast ballots as long as they are in the county where they are registered. Blackwell appealed to the 6th Circuit.
"Today's ruling reaffirms Secretary Blackwell's understanding of the law," Blackwell spokesman Carlo LoParo said in a statement. "Unfortunately the frivolous lawsuits filed by the Ohio Democratic Party and its allies have needlessly wasted the valuable time of election officials across the state as they prepare for this important election."
Democrats said Saturday they were disappointed by the ruling but were ready to move on with election preparations.
"To avoid any confusion, we are not going to appeal this ruling," David Sullivan, voter protection coordinator for the Ohio Democratic Party, said in a statement. "That way we can ensure that voters and election officials understand that voters must be in the proper polling place before casting a vote."
The 6th Circuit did rule that the Democrats had a right to file the lawsuit. Lawyers for the Department of Justice (news - web sites) on Friday had filed a brief in support of Blackwell saying Ohio Democrats weren't legally entitled to challenge Blackwell's position.
Similar court battles are under way in other states. In Florida, a federal judge ruled Thursday that the state must reject provisional ballots if they are cast in the wrong precinct.
In Michigan, a federal judge said those ballots must be counted if cast by voters at the wrong precinct but in the right city, township or village. That decision also has been appealed to the 6th Circuit, but the appellate court has yet to issue a ruling in that case.
In Missouri and Colorado, judges have ruled that votes in the wrong place don't have to be counted.
Provisional ballots are not counted until after the election. They are set aside and inspected by Democratic and Republican election board employees to establish their validity.
States nationwide have adopted individual standards for when a provisional ballot can be cast and counted. Twenty-six states and the District of Columbia require a provisional ballot to be cast in the correct precinct, or it will not count.
In 2000, Bush beat Al Gore (news - web sites) by only 3.6 percentage points in Ohio, which went for Democrat Bill Clinton (news - web sites) in the two previous elections. More than 100,000 provisional ballots were cast in Ohio during the 2000 election.
Go Buckeyes!!!!
Excellent!
Now if they can just do the same in Michigan...
MGY
Yes, this DOES suppress the vote: the "vote early and often" crowd, the vote of non-existent voters based on phoney registrations, the votes of graveyard residents, the votes in the name of dementia victims in nursing homes.
Good! Maybe the sane, non-moron, voters who know where their precinct is, and how to cast their votes without spoiling the ballot, will be count a little more this time. Again; a good result.
Only if they made sure to use a different name on each. Not that that would be hard or anything...
a good link for election law news
http://minerva.hmdnsgroup.com/~votelaw/blog/archives/election_litigationprosecutions/
BWA HA HA HA HA HA HAHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! MY FORMER PARTY LOSES AGAIN!!! BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! I LOVE IT!!
Thank goodness. Common sense prevails after a period of insanity.
Why Drudge labels this ruling "Chaos" is a mystery. The first ruling fell in that category, not this law-affirming one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.