Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

October Surprise? NYT DEVELOPING EXCLUSIVE FRONT PAGE STORY ON TERRORISTS AND EXPLOSIVES
DrudgeReport ^ | 10/24/2004 | Drudge

Posted on 10/24/2004 5:55:31 PM PDT by spacejunkie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 661-662 next last
To: wjeanw

it's about 350 tons of explosives looted from some arms dump in Iraq. It's going to blame the Administration for leaving it "unprotected" in the early days after the war.


21 posted on 10/24/2004 6:02:38 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Well if something bad does happen, some people talking about an "October surprise" are going to have some explaining to do.


22 posted on 10/24/2004 6:02:45 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie

Bad for Bush? Yeah, but considering what's been tossed against the wall in this election, this is chicken feed.


23 posted on 10/24/2004 6:02:59 PM PDT by July 4th (You need to click "Abstimmen")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison46

i agree


24 posted on 10/24/2004 6:03:51 PM PDT by Taggart_D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie
Storyline:

There is not now, nor has there ever, nor shall there ever be absent the re-selection by intimidation of black voters and by excessive litigation of George W. Bush the Failure to the Presidency for four more years, any connection between terrorists and explosives outside the fantastical imagination of certain certifiably idiotic and deranged right-wing conservatives ideologues, and any historical imagery to the contrary merely constitutes a cruel figment of the imagination of such said idiotic ideologues perpetuated on the American people through intimidation and fear and through media outlets dedicated to the hate-mongering that is the attitude of President Bush, according to unimpeachable intelligence sources used by the upstanding Presidential campaign of the distinguished junior Senator from the Great Commonwealth of Massachusetts, John F. Kerry, and any statement to the contrary effectively constitutes a highly illegal and most dangerous form of defamation of the such said Senator and all people of good will, for it is now hereby certified and is so decreed, so help us Kerry!
25 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:02 PM PDT by dufekin (President Kerry would have our enemies partying like it's 1969, when Kerry first committed treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

pretty clear. In the early days, they stole this stuff and we didn't want it out. And they are blowing things up with it. Does this stuff count as WMD?


26 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:15 PM PDT by cajungirl (Kerry:Bad for Geese, Bad for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wjeanw

This is such a hatchet job against Bush. Just like the Casper Weinberger non-story that was drudged up in the days before the '92 election, this is is old news that is being trumpeted as front page just to harm Bush. Despicable.


27 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:26 PM PDT by Azzurri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11

You mean from the WMD the Times said weren't there?


28 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:36 PM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie

Mmmm.... So someone looted explosives along with a lot of weapons in the mayhem that followed the fall of Saddams regime. Isn't this old news? If this was about someone looting WMD's it would be more interesting.


29 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:41 PM PDT by Trippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison46

Bush bashing? So nuclear grade explosives hurts Bush? Dont see it.


30 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:43 PM PDT by aft_lizard (Actually i voted for John Kerry before I voted against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheHube

I posted this a little while ago and the thread was pulled. I don't know why.


31 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:43 PM PDT by tazannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie

This is like the foot on the throat comment that Drudge was breathlessly humping the other day thay died in like 2 seconds


32 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:45 PM PDT by skaterboy (Thanks for being there Lammykins...Just need to be alone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie

It's the NYT's Director of Circulation calling Drudge in order to sell Monday's newspaper.


33 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:50 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie

NYT's?

Eh. Let 'em give it their best. :-D


34 posted on 10/24/2004 6:04:55 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: July 4th

Yes, this is bad for Bush. This combined with the newly found "prison abuse diary" will take away some precious votes.


35 posted on 10/24/2004 6:05:10 PM PDT by tirednvirginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Azzurri

You mean from the WMDs the Times said weren't there?


36 posted on 10/24/2004 6:05:21 PM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
Doesn't "it" seem as though we're all in suspended animation, somehow? Been waiting for the other shoe to drop for over a year...

I couldn't have said it better myself, that is exactly how I feel. I am always pessimistic whenever NYT does any story, they hate Bush. Sigh, I will try and get some sleep and not listen to Drudge. Whenever I listen to him I am up until 2 am.

37 posted on 10/24/2004 6:05:30 PM PDT by MissyMa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wjeanw

"On the contrary, the NYT is going to use it as evidence of the Bush Administration's mishandling of the war."

I'm afraid you're correct on this one. They will spin it to bash GW.

This is NOT the Monday morning Kerry story. The blogs are now saying that it will run on page one of the WAPO. If it's there, however, I can't imagine it hurting Kerry...unless the WAPO staff have lost their kneepads.

-Toonces


38 posted on 10/24/2004 6:05:33 PM PDT by Toonces T. Cat (The Token Republican in Deep South Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tirednvirginia

Folks, the sky is not falling. We should step back before we believe that we are doomed by some story in the NYT.


39 posted on 10/24/2004 6:05:42 PM PDT by Doctorlawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie

Its about 8:00, Sunday night, breaking news developing...must be almost time for Drudge.


40 posted on 10/24/2004 6:05:42 PM PDT by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 661-662 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson