Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: icecold
How could this have happened where there were no WMD's?
NYT's propaganda for Kerry.
2 posted on 10/24/2004 7:22:25 PM PDT by ladyinred (John Kerry is flipping off America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ladyinred
Really! The idiots at the NYT's think this is going to hurt Bush?

This only confirms Bush's claim that Iraq was armed to the teeth and a danger to the world....and even WORSE that these arms could have gotten into the hands of terrorists.

And WHO wins when Americans feel threatened by terrorism. BUSH.
All polls show Bush beats Kerry when it comes to the war on terrorism.

67 posted on 10/24/2004 7:37:24 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ladyinred

Agree with you and note;
Not only are these super-high-yield explosives... these particular explosives are ones used in the triggering process for nuclear weapons.

I think the question needs to be posed to the IAEA, the UN Weapon Inspectors, The UN which was not enforcing the sanctions and the Truce agreement Saddam agreed to after the Gulf War, and Bill Clinton;

"What were 350 tons of these high explosives (RDX and HMX),doing in Iraq in the first place??????"

Hey Blix and UN WMD Inspectors, Bill Clinton, Senator-Candidates Kerry and Edwards, and the whole U.S. Congress read this..."these explosives are the ones used in the triggering process for nuclear weapons."

And I don't care whether they were under IAEA seal while Saddam was in power or not. The last time the IAEA was in Iraq was when, 1998? Need I ask again, what were these explosives doing in Iraq at the start of the war?

If the NYTimes breaks this story, will no one ask these questions above.


100 posted on 10/24/2004 7:43:07 PM PDT by focusandclarity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ladyinred
Site Meter Kerry doesn't truly care if there were WMD's or not...
144 posted on 10/24/2004 7:56:19 PM PDT by KMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ladyinred
How could this have happened where there were no WMD's?

Perhaps because these were conventional explosives.

Do you REALLY not understand the distinction?

--

FF
351 posted on 10/25/2004 2:48:59 PM PDT by Fred Fighter (Don't trust me! Read for yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson