Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timeout

Doesn't this mean that the UN lied about Saddam having these weapons?


70 posted on 10/25/2004 6:38:13 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis (Liberals lie at the premise, accept their premise and you can only lose the argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim_Curtis
"Doesn't this mean that the UN lied about Saddam having these weapons?"

LOL!!!

361 posted on 10/25/2004 7:40:55 PM PDT by cookcounty (Kerry launched his career by trashing the VN Vets. He ends by trashing the NG. Such class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Jim_Curtis
"Doesn't this mean that the UN lied about Saddam having these weapons?"

Best I can tell is that the UN knew about these explosives but determined them to be of no international significance, so they allowed Saddam to keep them. Now of course they're claiming that the explosives are indeed dangerous, and that the US military screwed up, yada yada yada.

422 posted on 10/25/2004 7:56:28 PM PDT by TheCrusader ("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II (c 1097 a.d.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson