Gee, do you suppose maybe all that diddling around for months with the UN gave terrorists ample opportunity to squirrel the explosives away somewhere BEFORE we arrived? Nah, who'd believe that...
Let's not forget Tom Daschle's "Why the rush to war?" stall.
The liberals accidentally helped the war effort ( probably saved some troops' lives ) by persuading Hussein to export ( or bury ) his WMDs so that they could send in inspectors to give him the "all clear" while they stalled Bush.
Much of the noise that the left makes against Bush regarding Iraq is to persuade Hussein that he wasn't duped by them so that Hussein doesn't spill the beans on the leftist-baathist Oil>Food/weapons removal dealings.
Yeah...who'd believe that?
And I guaran-peejay-tee you...that the same people who are trying to rip POTUS a new one about going into Iraq and not finding weapons of mass destruction, would be trying to rip him a new one if he didn't go in there, and we ended up getting hit by a nuclear weapon, the deadly results of which would have made 9-11 look like a...
...(if I dood it, I get a whuppin...I dood it)...
NUISANCE???
What would be the first thing you would hear? "OF COURSE THERE WERE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION! ALL OF OUR INTELLIGENCE SAID SO!"
Then the Left would trot out the statements by Halfbright, Weasely Clark, Ted (hiccup) Kennedy, Al Gollum, BJ Clinton, She Who Must Not Be Named, Flurch Munster, Silky Pony, and all the others.
And you know what? They would have a valid point.
But this happens under a President who is followed by the letter "R"...BUSH LIED! RUSH TO WAR! I WOULD HAVE DONE EVERYTHING DIFFERENTLY! WRONG WAR, WRONG PLACE, WRONG TIME! QUAGMIRE!"
Uh, waiter..Advil, please?