Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeAtlanta

The NY Times story actually never stated that there were explosives there when the troops arrived. They do state that the troops found nothing when they arrived, but they've buried that fact under alot of speculation and spin such that they imply that Bush let the explosives get looted. You can bet that they will retract nothing.


92 posted on 10/25/2004 6:42:37 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


I seem to remember this story during the main combat. Our troops searched for these things, and there was a big hullabaloo that we had found WMD in the press briefings..There were supposed to be those explosives there tagged with a IAEA seal but nothing was there. This stuff went missing under the UN's watch you can bet your underwear on it. I hope that we have some hard evidence to prove this because nailing Kerry and the UN is always a great Twofer.


122 posted on 10/25/2004 6:48:18 PM PDT by DSBull (Liberal logic: the most mutually exclusive words in the universe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: rocklobster11
All this proves is that the NY Times is willing to be used as a tool by the DNC...a week out from an election.

But hey, we all knew it, and predicted it. Let them pay the piper.

126 posted on 10/25/2004 6:49:01 PM PDT by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson