In effect the Dems are saying: "There were no dangerous weapons and Bush failed to secure them."
Or, as an email from the Bush campaign to Drudge mocks, it's as if the Rats are now saying: "Bush should have gone into Iraq sooner". LOL
According to Kerry in the first debate - we took the wrong course of action against the war on terror by diverting our efforts to an area without terrorists.
Then this story breaks out and Kerry says today that the weapons that were mishandled by a bad commander in chief and they could be used by terrorists to commit crimes abroad or at home.
Which is it.... There are no weapons and terrorists in Iraq - or - there are deadly weapons that can fall into the hands of terrorists and Bush should have protected those weapons?
I just keep praying that God will empower the electorate on 11/2/04 and this country will remain safe under solid and steadfast leadership. God help us all if this joker is elected.