195 posted on
10/25/2004 8:42:59 PM PDT by
bitt
(F'n, Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?)
Thanx. One more Q. I just tracked down Miklasewki's report as posted on FR. Maybe I'm up to late but his report seemed like double talk.He says the 101 took over the base temporarily. Didn't find the weapons. Then he has Iraqi officials saying weapons were lost due to no security. Who the hell was supposed to provide security to Al Qaqaa at that time before 101 got there. If you parse his words carefuly I get something like the 101 got there, didn't find the Cemtex and moved on. The base was not secured and was then looted, including the Cemtex which was not found in the short time the 101 occupied the base.
If Mik's words can be parsed in this way does this story contradict NYT? And no I'm not a troll, or else I've been trolling for 4 years. Just want to get this as right as the fonts.