Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Time4Atlas2Shrug

The fighting had not yet ended completely at this time. Drudge reads the story as saying the weapons were gone when the 101 got there. Miklasewki's actual report is not at all clear on that. I think, barring more info, the Dems can still claim that the 101 because it still had fighting to do could not secure the base, and the base was then looted. This would allow Dems to attack the planning for Iraq war as being insufficient in troop strength to secure the country. The results of which have led to deadly attacks on US troops by weapons produced from the unprotected explosives. I just think it's possible we're celebrating much too soon. We need to know what the 101 did at alQaqaa. What was it tasked to find? What did it find and how long did it secure the facility?


220 posted on 10/25/2004 9:38:11 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: xkaydet65

"The fighting had not yet ended completely at this time. Drudge reads the story as saying the weapons were gone when the 101 got there. Miklasewki's actual report is not at all clear on that. I think, barring more info, the Dems can still claim that the 101 because it still had fighting to do could not secure the base, and the base was then looted. This would allow Dems to attack the planning for Iraq war as being insufficient in troop strength to secure the country. The results of which have led to deadly attacks on US troops by weapons produced from the unprotected explosives. I just think it's possible we're celebrating much too soon. We need to know what the 101 did at alQaqaa. What was it tasked to find? What did it find and how long did it secure the facility?"

This is from Miklasewki's report:

"April 10, 2003, only three weeks into the war, NBC News was embedded with troops from the Army's 101st Airborne as they temporarily take over the Al Qakaa weapons installation south of Baghdad. But these troops never found the nearly 380 tons of some of the most powerful conventional explosives, called HMX and RDX, which is now missing. The U.S. troops did find large stockpiles of more conventional weapons, but no HMX or RDX..."

It's saying that when the troops arrived, the high explosives were already gone. That's exactly what Drudge et al is reporting.


223 posted on 10/25/2004 9:48:18 PM PDT by Cyclopean Squid (The Hand of Providence is moved by the Arm of Volition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

To: xkaydet65

I am just noting what NBC claims it saw when their imbeds arrived with the 101st in April. NRO Kerry Spot reports on this:

http://www.nationalreview.com/kerry/kerryspot.asp

It seems as if NBC said that there were none of the particular weapons in question when they arrived.


225 posted on 10/25/2004 9:51:39 PM PDT by Time4Atlas2Shrug (Bush/Cheney '04: "Four more years of hell".......for the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

To: xkaydet65

The fighting had not ended but the important high explosives that the NY Times is bitching about were not there .... the NT Times "news" articles are the equivalent to grade F meat ... not fit for human consumption


226 posted on 10/25/2004 9:53:23 PM PDT by cohokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson