Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Acts Against General Who Saw a 'Christian' War
Reuters on Yahoo ^ | 10/26/04 | Andrea Shalal-Esa

Posted on 10/26/2004 7:24:12 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Army has taken action against Lt. Gen. William Boykin, who embarrassed the Bush administration by giving speeches in which he described the war on terrorism as a Christian battle against Satan.

Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Richard Cody declined to give any details of the action taken in response to Boykin's remarks, which violated Pentagon (news - web sites) rules, but said it was not "significant."

"I took the appropriate action based on the recommendations of the Inspector General," Cody told Reuters while attending the annual meeting of the Association of the U.S. Army.

He did not say when the action was taken.

"If it was something significant, it would be something we would talk about. So that should give you an indication," Cody said.

Boykin, who was at the meeting, declined comment.

The Pentagon inspector general concluded in an August report that Boykin should face "appropriate corrective action" because he failed to clear official data in some of the 23 religious-oriented speeches he gave after January 2002.

Although he initially described the war against terrorism as a "crusade," President Bush (news - web sites) has since worked to shore up relations with Muslim states and avoid the appearance of a Christian-Muslim struggle.

The Bush administration has come under fire from Muslim Americans for what they see as heavy-handed law enforcement in a crackdown against groups associated with al Qaeda, blamed for the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.

ARAB AMERICAN ANGER

Recent polls have shown a strong swing against Bush among Arab Americans in the race to next week's presidential election in which Bush is neck-and-neck with Democratic challenger Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites).

Boykin touched off a firestorm when he gave a series of speeches while in uniform in which he referred to the war on terrorism as a battle with Satan.

He said America had been targeted "because we're a Christian nation." He said later he was not anti-Islam or any other religion.

Muslim groups and lawmakers condemned Boykin's comments and Bush said the remarks "didn't reflect my opinion."

The Muslim groups also raised questions about what role Boykin, deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence, may have played in creating U.S. military interrogation policy before a scandal erupted over the abuse of prisoners in Iraq (news - web sites).

The Pentagon report said Boykin had been obliged to clear the speeches with the Pentagon, given "the sensitive nature of his remarks concerning U.S. policy and the likelihood that he would be perceived by his audiences as a DOD spokesman based on his official position and his appearance in uniform."

Boykin also failed to issue a required disclaimer at the speeches that he was not representing official Pentagon policy, and failed to report his receipt of one travel payment exceeding $260 from a non-government source, it concluded.

In its 10-month internal investigation the Pentagon did not address whether the substance of Boykin's remarks was appropriate for a senior Pentagon official or whether it compromised his fitness to perform his duties.

That question, it said, should be decided by senior Pentagon officials.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has praised Boykin's "outstanding record" and refused to reprimand the general, who played a role in a 1993 battle with Somali warlords and the ill-fated hostage rescue attempt in Iran in 1980.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: acts; boykin; christian; general; williamboykin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Mad Mammoth
I truly hope so. If not, bomb shelters will be the new plastics.
21 posted on 10/26/2004 8:04:07 PM PDT by radicalamericannationalist (Kurtz had the right answer but the wrong location.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

BTTT


22 posted on 10/26/2004 8:08:28 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radicalamericannationalist

The enemy is opposed to civil righteousness. The enemy has seen defeat where it counts and cannot undo it. The enemy can kiss my grits.


23 posted on 10/26/2004 8:09:27 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: FarRightTexasDude

Well said.


25 posted on 10/26/2004 8:18:51 PM PDT by aposiopetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FarRightTexasDude

"Followers of Mohammed (Muslims) are conditionally peaceful. They resort to violence to acheive their goals when peaceful means are not sufficient. This is diametrically opposed to the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Our proper response as Christians to the violence that is propigated by Islamic fighters is to PRAY for peace, PRAY for our enemies, PRAY for the protection of innocent people and PRAY for the salvation of those blinded by Islamic teachings.
The proper response of our government is to send out sufficiently trained and equipped military and para-military forces to UTTERLY DESTROY our enemies and secure their UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER."


Doesn't that only work if our government is not made of Christians?


26 posted on 10/26/2004 8:44:09 PM PDT by spinestein (Nov 2nd. Don't forget to flush the Johns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Boykin touched off a firestorm when he gave a series of speeches while in uniform in which he referred to the war on terrorism as a battle with Satan.

He said America had been targeted "because we're a Christian nation." He said later he was not anti-Islam or any other religion.

Muslim groups and lawmakers condemned Boykin's comments and Bush said the remarks "didn't reflect my opinion."

Muslim groups should spend more time comdemning the beheadings of their murderous co-religionists.

27 posted on 10/26/2004 8:49:02 PM PDT by Fatalis (The Libertarian Party is to politics as Esperanto is to linguistics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: FarRightTexasDude

Concise and true. No argument here.


29 posted on 10/26/2004 10:09:33 PM PDT by spinestein (Nov 2nd. Don't forget to flush the Johns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson