Replies

When it comes right down to the final analysis, kerry is attempting to put the blame on the President for failing to secure a single weapons storage facility. The fact that no one has yet proven the weapons were at the facility when the US forces arrived is not a relevant factor to kerry, the dnc or the MSM. But what is really absurd is having these groups place upon the President the responsibility for handling specific actions in a war. The President makes policy. The military carries out policy. Yet, kerry, the dnc and the MSM are implying the President should be overseeing each and every detail of the entire war. That is precisely what went wrong in Viet Nam. To paraphrase lbjerk, "Those men can't go to the latrine without my approval".

All of this "missing munitions" question is nothing but a story concocted by the IAEA, the kerry campaign, the dnc and the MSM. They were attempting to create a question to which the President could not respond just a week prior to the election. But again, they all overlooked the internet and how quickly people found answers that the media assumed would neither be asked, and definitely not answered. cbs and dan rather(gate) were going to run this 2 days prior to the election with the plan to give the election to kerry.

America had better wake up. dan rather is convinced you are too stupid to think and vote for the man he has selected to be the next President. He tried in 2000 and failed. He has tried again, 2 times in the last 2 months. He is going to convince you that only he knows who should get your vote. If you won't vote his way, he'll lie about the results and tell you that kerry won.