Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut voting for president underway
WTNH ^ | October 27, 2004 | AP

Posted on 10/27/2004 3:30:03 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough

(Hartford-AP, Oct. 27, 2004 Updated 5:07 PM) _ Early voting in the presidential race is available for some Connecticut residents.

Early voting is allowed under Connecticut law for voters who did not register by the October 19th deadline and only want to vote for president.

A change in the way the state handles the presidential ballots allows unregistered voters to vote in the presidential race from now until the polls close on Election Day.

The changes were made to avoid the problems created four years ago when town clerks were inundated by unregistered voters wanting to cast presidential-only ballots.

A spokesman for Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz says another change is a clarification of what kind of identification is acceptable to qualify for a presidential ballot.

A photo ID or some proof of residence, such as utility bill, will be required to obtain a presidential ballot.

More than 30,000 people used the presidential ballot on Election Day in 2000.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS:
Ummm... 30,000 is almost a tenth of the estimated 2003 population of Connecticut.
1 posted on 10/27/2004 3:30:03 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Ummm... 30,000 is almost a tenth of the estimated 2003 population of Connecticut.

Wonder how many of these voted in other states too.

2 posted on 10/27/2004 3:36:11 PM PDT by peyton randolph (tag...you're it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

Pop. of CT is over 3 million . Make that 1% .


3 posted on 10/27/2004 3:36:25 PM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

They can't follow any rules, so they just change them. This crap's gonna kill us!


4 posted on 10/27/2004 3:36:48 PM PDT by FrogMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Ummm... 30,000 is almost a tenth of the estimated 2003 population of Connecticut.

No, it is less than 1% of the population of CT.

5 posted on 10/27/2004 3:39:15 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Always ask yourself, does this pass the Global Test?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07; sushiman

10%, 1%, - Damn that lousy CT school system.


6 posted on 10/27/2004 4:01:24 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough (Bush 2004 in an F'n landslide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough

The interesting thing is that Bysiewicz's office never compiled the votes from these Y2K "presidential" ballots. So we have no idea what percentage were for Gore--but from the stories I heard at the time, of large groups of "voters" suddenly descending on a polling place, demanding presidential ballots, leaving as a group, and then the same thing happening a little while later in an adjacent town, it's not unlikely that a lot of those ballots were cast fraudulently, and that this contributed to Gore's lopsided victory in this state and his proported larger popular vote nationally.


7 posted on 10/27/2004 6:58:24 PM PDT by Carborundum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson