Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: McGruff
Either this false story or Condi is ill informed.

Karl Rove was on as well, and he didn't mention the story.

Just another dead end, I'm afraid.

29 posted on 10/28/2004 8:38:50 AM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: skip_intro

Condi is Russia lover. Remember, they can do no wrong. Did the russians not complain when we bombed thier diplomat convoy.


32 posted on 10/28/2004 8:42:07 AM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: skip_intro

true.

But that doesn't mean the WH can't simply say that the material wasn't there when US forces secured the facility. There is plenty of evidence for that. We don't need this Russian angle, we can do a better job refuting this attack by simplying saying the stuff was gone when we arrived.


33 posted on 10/28/2004 8:42:36 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: skip_intro

Condi is a Russia expert. She won't comment before the official investigation. The Gertz article offsets the NYT article.


35 posted on 10/28/2004 8:44:31 AM PDT by DaveMSmith (I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations about --oh,nevermind.-GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson