Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists estimate 100,000 Iraqis may have died in war
AP ^ | 10/28/4 | EMMA ROSS

Posted on 10/28/2004 10:42:45 AM PDT by SmithL

LONDON -- A survey of deaths in Iraqi households estimates that as many as 100,000 more people may have died throughout the country in the 18 months after the U.S. invasion than would be expected based on the death rate before the war.

There is no official figure for the number of Iraqis killed since the conflict began, but some non-governmental estimates range from 10,000 to 30,000. As of Wednesday, 1,081 U.S. servicemen had been killed, according to the U.S. Defense Department.

The scientists who wrote the report concede that the data they based their projections on were of "limited precision,"

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: junkscientists; liberalscientists; warishell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
They admit that they made these numbers up, but AP considers this to be "Breaking News."

Go Figure.

1 posted on 10/28/2004 10:42:46 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

What a load of crap!


2 posted on 10/28/2004 10:44:13 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Let me guess, "Social Scientists".


3 posted on 10/28/2004 10:44:29 AM PDT by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Stupid jouralism to say the least.


4 posted on 10/28/2004 10:44:33 AM PDT by Trippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Limited precision and limited intellect.

MV


5 posted on 10/28/2004 10:44:37 AM PDT by madvlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
A survey of deaths in Iraqi households estimates that as many as 100,000 more people may have died throughout the country in the 18 months after the U.S. invasion than would be expected based on the death rate before the war.

Well sure. Before the war, nobody died. They just disappeared.

6 posted on 10/28/2004 10:44:56 AM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (How do you ask a goose to be the last goose to die for the Kerry campaign?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The scientists who wrote the report concede that the data they based their projections on were of "limited precision,"

In other words, they pulled the number from their arse.
7 posted on 10/28/2004 10:45:04 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Ignorance, bigotry, envy, and gluttony are a few floor joists in the democratic platform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"based on the death rate before the war"

? You mean when Saddam was killing them? What kind of crap is this?


8 posted on 10/28/2004 10:45:10 AM PDT by nuconvert (Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Hey! They could have said that there had been 1,000,000 deaths.


9 posted on 10/28/2004 10:45:21 AM PDT by Piquaboy (John F-ng Kerry was a traitor to his fellow soldiers and now his country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Still far less than should have happened on 9/12/01.


10 posted on 10/28/2004 10:45:21 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The highest number I'd seen was from the lunatic commies at Human Rights Watch, and that was 10,000.  They arrived at that number citing wide spread use of fragmentation bombs over densely populated civilian areas.

What a frickin' joke.

Owl_Eagle

" WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH"


11 posted on 10/28/2004 10:45:47 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (And they make fun of the way W says Nuclear... Jenjis???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Where are the bodies and / or graves? Death records? Etc. It is not as if Iraq is, or has been, oh, pretty much for the past few thousand years, an illiterate, undocumented jungle area. Very definitive numbers with relatively low degrees of error should be obtainable for any deaths besides those in Saddam's death camps and torture facilities.


12 posted on 10/28/2004 10:45:50 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Right makes right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Y'know, this is another charge of the Left that can be answered with: "So what?".
13 posted on 10/28/2004 10:45:57 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (--Scots Gaelic: 'War or Peace'--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I wonder how many Iraqi soldiers we exterminated.


14 posted on 10/28/2004 10:46:10 AM PDT by cripplecreek (We've turned the corner and we're not smokin crack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

AP is simply trying to fire up its base.


15 posted on 10/28/2004 10:46:18 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I remember seeing an armored vehicle soldier recalling the taking of Baghdad. He said they killed thousands, literally thousands. He was almost overcome by the experience. That is just one approach to the city.
16 posted on 10/28/2004 10:47:05 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

better them then me


17 posted on 10/28/2004 10:47:15 AM PDT by rang1995
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Ahhhh....the shining Sea Of Thisusdedtobethemiddleeast!

Lovely!
18 posted on 10/28/2004 10:47:20 AM PDT by Dallas59 ("A bad peace is even worse than war" -Taticus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Even assuming they are correct, how far ahead is the 100,000 figure from the execuitions, starvation and torture victims said to have been killed by Saddam?

Didn't people complain that the sanctions were starving thousands of children a month?

Hey, maybe 100,000 in 18 months is an improvement!

I'm not trying to be flippant, or devaluing human lives, but sometimes even by its own terms this kind of crap can be quickly dismissed.

Remember - Amnesty International went soft on Saddam's Iraq.


19 posted on 10/28/2004 10:47:39 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Mm-hmm. And where did they get the numbers of the death rate before the war? From Saddam's Ministry of Information? You know, this is just exactly the kind of "survey" that lead to the constant cry all through the 1990s that a million Iraqi children a year were dying because of the sanctions. I notice we haven't heard a peep out of those folks since the war started. They'll be yelping again now, though.


20 posted on 10/28/2004 10:48:11 AM PDT by wizardoz (Votez pour Jean Kerry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson