What now? I agree -- if the court is going to come up with some bizarre way to apply part x and part y and z of the BOR to the states, then they damn well better apply the whole thing. That, however, is NOT what you have been discussing with me. You have continued to say that the BOR has always applied to the states and that is what was intended. Both of which are false. As I stated earlier -- because the CONS has been utterly destroyed by both the Congress and the SC since at least 1937, and is now completely dead, I favor gun rights by ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER PERIOD NO HOLDS BARRED AT ALL. I don't care if the SC says we all get guns because the Monroe doctrine as described by Jeffersonian agrarians and promulgated by the Amphicitionic Confederacy dictates it. I WANT MY GUNS!! AND I DON'T CARE HOW I GET THEM. I will not, however, pretend that the BOR dictates it. Now does that convince you that I love guns? Or am I still just a faker?
I WANT MY GUNS!! AND I DON'T CARE HOW I GET THEM. I will not, however, pretend that the BOR dictates it. Now does that convince you that I love
guns? Or am I still just a faker?
-ray-
______________________________________
I'm more convinced that ever that you are deeply confused.
Get some rest.
Are you referring to the wholesale expansion of the size and reach of the Federal government via the Commerce Clause?
It still plagues us today with a huge Federal bureaucracy involving itself in areas such as health care, domestic crime, and education.
Interestingly enough, all Federal gun laws were passed using the Commerce Clause as the grant of authority.