[Puppage]

How he'd go anywhere at anytime to debate those "right wing blonde bimbos, Coulter and Ingraham."

The liberals MO......name calling

[BenLurkin]

Never heard of Eddie Schultz. Is this someone who has strut and fretted his hour on the stage?

[JustTheTruth]

Problem is that they're close enough in some states that cheating - which always do and they WILL do again - COULD push them over into the win category for the Rats.

[TexasTaysor]

I haven't heard of this program, but speaking of liberals on the edge....did you see Phil Donahue on Fox last night? Talk about loud, shrill, angry, name calling and ready for a very long vacation. I'm seeing this more and more in the liberals appearances

[Fruitbat]

But come on, can't you see the wisdom of the world being better off if Saddam were in power?

I mean think about it, if Hitler ruled the world, then as long as we all did what he said there'd be peace.

[hiredhand]

This is because we do NOT fear. We aren't driven by fear and paranoia. This should be apparent to conservatives, although I don't think the left percieves, or understands it.

I think we're all concerned, but the left is going through thrashing motions in their (justified) fear that they'll be out of power for FOUR more years.

The thing that concerns me the most is their pattern of violence. As we get closer, and their prospects for winning look less and less viable, they become more violent and incoherent in their blind anger.

Given this pattern, I wonder what are they going to escalate to when GWB retains the Executive Office? The pattern is NOT that they hang their heads and appologize when caught in an untruth, or when their wrong thinking is exposed. The pattern is for them to "step it up", and drive even harder.

If GWB retains the Executive Office and the left keeps this pattern up, it's gonna be uglier than anything we've seen up to this point.

[SuperSonic]

I like this sign.

= ^ )

[DennisR]

"Goes nuts?" Ed IS nuts.

[NoobRep]

But would he debate Michael Savage?

[UncleSamUSA]

If that's how he feels about Laura and Ann, they must be doing something incredibly right.

And I'd go anywhere, anytime to hobnob with them as well. I'd just be a WHOLE LOT friendlier when I got there !!!

[sandbar]

>1) How he'd go anywhere at anytime to debate those "right >wing blonde bimbos, Coulter and Ingraham."

As a blonde female, I'm insulted!!! How dare he be so...so... POLITICALLY INCORRECT!!!

Democrats, the party of tolerance. How sexist of this jerk.

[firefighter302]

I'm a conservative, Shadowfax, and I feel excellent about President Bush being re-elected.

I humbly suggest anyone with doubts, do the EV math... Kerry needs to win nearly every large closely contested state to reach 270. Ohio AND Florida, nearly certainly. Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Iowa are disputable. Michigan , Hawaii and New Jersey are ALREADY CONSIDERED as certain Kerry wins. I'll wait for the actual vote, myself.

It is possible, but highly unlikely the comrade Kerry will win.

I'm lookind forward to Tuesday, Nov. 2, and another Bush Win!

Of course, JMHO.

Rick Firefighter302

[sandbar]

>1) How he'd go anywhere at anytime to debate those "right >wing blonde bimbos, Coulter and Ingraham."

Besides, they'd chew him up and spit him out. And not in a good way.

[wack-m and stack-m]

I have some very personal insght into the silly rants of Ed Schultz. I had the unfortunate experience of working with this man for about 6 years. You see, Ed's vast political experience comes from a 20 year career as a small-market TV sportscaster. And that's it. I will give Ed this, he is a gifted communicator...always has been...but so is the used car salesman down the street, and that is what Ed is. He will say ANYTHING...and believe me I know from personal experience...he'll say anything he thinks or, mostly, what someone else tells him to think, if it means getting ratings.

During all the years I worked closely and daily with Ed he was a die-hard redneck conservative! And I mean RED-NECK along with all the political, racial and gender biased stereotypes that go along with that label. When he started doing local talk radio in Fargo he was known as a louder, more boisterous version of Rush. But a couple of years ago things changed. A popular conservative talk-radio host by the name of Scott Hennen moved into the Fargo market and Ed's ratings started to sag a bit. It was during this time the left was going bonkers about not having a voice in talk radio. Ed's biggest driving force is his ego...and as a hard line right-winger in North Dakota he had no inside track to the marbled halls of Washington D.C.. The North Dakota congressional delegation is as democrat as you can get with senior senators Byron Dorgan and Kent Conrad as well as longtime congressman Earl Pomeroy and they had always avoided dealing with Ed seeing him as "enemy territory". But now with true conservative competition I believe Ed saw an open door and welcoming arms and he walked right through, almost overnight going from an anti-tax, anti-government conservative to a big-government, tax and spend liberal...all for open doors in Washington and a shot at an ego-stroking "national" radio show.

It is my opinion, based on experience, that Ed has little or no personal conviction in anything he says. I believe it's all an act to try and grab as many ears as possible. So keep this in mind when you run across "Big Eddie" on the dial...if you can ever find him.