Posted on 10/29/2004 8:13:14 AM PDT by bourbon
Why the "60 Minutes" Story on Emmett Till Was a Disappointment
By David T. Beito and Linda Royster Beito
Mr. Beito is an associate professor of history at the University of Alabama and Linda Royster Beito is chair of the Department of Social Sciences at Stillman College. They are writing a biography of T.R.M. Howard, a civil rights leader and entrepreneur who helped to find witnesses and evidence in the Emmett Till case. David T. Beito is also a member of Liberty and Power, a group blog at the History News Network.
In the wake of memogate, "60 Minutes" has done it again. Sunday’s report on the killing of Emmett Till was an example of slipshod and misleading journalism. The producers have few excuses in this case. They did it with their eyes open. They were warned not just once but several times that their forthcoming report might contain inaccuracies. In a rush to air the story, however, they plowed ahead, instead of following the first rule of journalism: getting their facts straight.
Certainly, a report on the killing of Emmett Till is long overdue. His story stands as one of the great tragedies and defining moments of American history. In August 1955, two white half brothers, J.W. Milam and Roy Bryant, kidnapped Till, a fourteen year old black boy, from his great uncle’s home. Several days later, his brutally beaten and horribly disfigured body was fished out of the Tallahatchie River. What had Till done to merit such treatment? Witnesses said that he wolf-whistled, and perhaps made suggestive remarks, to Bryant’s pretty young wife, Carolyn (now Carolyn Bryant Donham) while buying bubblegum at Bryant’s store in the hamlet of Money, Mississippi.
The Till case was a media sensation as journalists from all over the world flocked to the small town of Sumner for the trial. When a Mississippi jury acquitted Milam and Bryant in September, protests erupted in Chicago, Los Angeles, Baltimore, and many other cities. Some historians contend that the fall-out from these events sparked the beginning of the modern civil rights movement. Only three months after the trial, in December 1955, the Montgomery bus boycott was underway because Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat to a white man.
Because the importance of this case both to the history of civil rights and to an ongoing federal investigation, journalists and historians share a greater than usual obligation to be careful with the facts. For this reason, the conduct of "60 Minutes" is especially disappointing.
How do we know this? For nearly ten years, we have been researching the case as part of our biography of civil rights leader T.R.M. Howard, who was instrumental in uncovering evidence and finding witnesses. We interviewed three of the individuals who were the focus of the "60 Minutes" report: Mamie Till-Mobley (Emmett’s mother), Henry Lee Loggins (a black employee of Milam), and Willie Reed (a black high school student who testified at the trial). We also examined numerous FBI documents and other primary sources. Tanya Simon, an employee of "60 Minutes," heard about our research and contacted us in June. We sent her a copy of our article for the History News Network published in April and the book chapters from our biography of Howard from which it derives. The HNN article analyzed our taped interviews in 2001 with Loggins and Reed. We were probably the first people to interview them about the case in nearly fifty years. We told filmmaker Keith Beauchamp about Loggins who conducted his own interview with him in 2002. We also sent Ms. Simon copies of the series of articles by Amos Dixon from 1956 that we had discussed at length in our HNN article and our biography of Howard. The articles had first appeared in the California Eagle, a well known black newspaper, and alleged that Henry Loggins had taken part in the crime.
When we had a chance to see "60 Minutes" on Sunday, we were dismayed by the sloppiness of the report. It included numerous errors and misleading information. The first sign of trouble was Ed Bradley’s introduction which promised far more than it delivered. He declared that the Department of Justice had opened its investigation in the spring "based on evidence suggesting than more than a dozen people may have been involved in the murder of Emmett Till and that at least five of them are still alive. Those five could face criminal prosecution. And before we tell you about them, let us tell you what happened to Emmett Till." Later he underlined this point again: "The U.S. Justice Department says that a number of other people who may have been involved in the kidnapping and murder of Emmett Till are still alive today. We spent much of the past five months tracking them down. When we come back, we will tell you who they are."
Despite this, "60 Minutes" never followed through on the promise to "tell" about these five suspects who are "still alive," not to mention the original twelve alleged participants in the crime. If the producers can identify these five individuals, they have a journalistic obligation to do so or, at the very least, provide some reason to believe that they even exist.
The only people named by "60 Minutes" as potential suspects who are still alive were Loggins, who allegedly took part in the crime, and Carolyn Bryant Donham. We found the segment on Loggins, including Ed Bradley’s interview and narration, to be particularly misleading. While Bradley quoted on air from one of the articles from the California Eagle we had sent to "60 Minutes," he did not even hint at the contradictory nature of the evidence against Loggins.
For example, when Bradley interviewed Willie Reed, he did not point out that at the trial itself Reed did not name any of the men on the truck, other than Milam. Reed only said that there were two black men (besides Till) and three white men (besides Milam). "60 Minutes" ignored the results of our interview with Reed in 2001 which identified the two black men as Levi "too tight" Collins (now dead) and Joe Willie Hubbard (whereabouts unknown). Reed specifically denied to us that Loggins was on the truck. Nor, as "60 Minutes" wrongly states, did Reed ever identify Bryant as one of the white men on the truck.
The producers of "60 Minutes" have an ethical obligation to correct their inaccurate information and to corroborate their claims that five participants in the kidnapping or murder are still alive. Given our previous experiences with "60 Minutes," however, we have little hope that they will do so. While the killing of Emmett Till deserves more attention from the media, the producers of "60 Minutes" have failed to fulfill their stated mission to serve the public good.
(((MS and vicinity PING)))
Ed Bradley
Of Sixty Minutes
Was investigating the Emmet Till case
I rolled my eyes, said "That'll be objective" and moved on.
Such a surprise, eh?
CBS, which had planned to break the explosives story on “60 Minutes” on Sunday — 36 hours before the election — said it now plans to run a story on the show charging that U.S. troops were sent to Iraq without proper body armor because of Bush’s tax cuts, a charge often leveled by Kerry.
Well looks Like Ed is pissed he couldn't inflame the Lefties with a WMD smear so he does his best at the next best thing...
Inflame Past Racial acts. I wouldn't be suprised if Ed even drops in a redo of the 2000 Campaign Ad with James Byrd's Daughter...
CBS-TRAITORS to America!
Ed Bradley is blind in one eye and can't see out of the other.
Are they really?
How much longer can they get away with stuff like this?
Pure CBS journalism. This type of crap has been going on at CBS for decades.
The relevance of the case is this: if Till was white, Bryant would just have beaten him to a pulp right then and there. Because he was black, Bryant killed him instead.
Which demonstrates that Bryant was racist and guilty of murder. It also demonstrates that Till was a dumbass - who goes into a place where he is a total newcomer and then hits on a local's wife in front of a local?
If I, a white man in this day and age, went into a white town in rural America that I'd never been to before and made a pass at some local dude's wife in front of him, I would expect to get my ass kicked but good.
It's just common sense.
Now it is time for the Robert Byrd sisters to come forward and tell the nation that George W. Bush is responsible for her brother's dragging death.
Does it involve a young George Bush? I have heard a rumour that he was missing for a few hours as a child in Dallas on a November afternoon in 1963. Maybe he did this too! (sarc)!
CBS, which had planned to break the explosives story on “60 Minutes” on Sunday — 36 hours before the election — said it now plans to run a story on the show charging that U.S. troops were sent to Iraq without proper body armor because of Bush’s tax cuts, a charge often leveled by Kerry.
6 posted on 10/29/2004 8:17:59 AM PDT by inpajamas
Teddy Kenndy was in Philly last weekend giving speeches about the evil republicans and church burnings
Where was he June 5th, 1998??
Who knows what CBS will try to pull with this week's edition of 60 Minutes. Will they try to sneak in a hit piece on Bush two days before the election?
I don't trust them. Unfortunately, a lot of Americans still think they're getting real news from CBS. That's what I worry about. They, along with others in the mainstream media, have more power and influence over the American people than they have earned.
Spread the word on the internet!
Post on internet boards AND e-mails!
John Kerry's Discharge
He won't sign Form 180
What is he hiding?
Kerry's Dishonorable Discharge?
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/blog-buzzcut.php?range=10%2F24%2F2004+-+10%2F30%2F2004
LATEST SWIFT BOAT VETS AD!
http://humaneventsonline.com.edgesuite.net/unfittolead.html
Swift Vets and POW's
We Have Questions
Free Videos!
http://www.swiftvetsandpows.com/
Hanoi Approved of Role Played By Kerry and VVAW
http://www.nysun.com/article/3756
Timeline of John Kerry
http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html
The whole 42:09 Stolen Honor online FREE right now! E-mail it NOW!
Stolen Honor nails Kerry and the VVAW
and how they lied at Winter Soldier.
And how Kerry lied to the US Senate in 1971
And how Kerry and his pack of liars caused our POW's to suffer!
Kerry and the DNC cannot stop
EVERYONE on the internet from seeing this!
http://stolenhonor.com/documentary/watch-video.asp
E-mail the FREE xxcerpts clips to everyone NOW!
http://stolenhonor.com/documentary/program-excerpts.asp
Click Here for
All the Latest Swift Boat Vets Ad!
http://www.swiftvets.com/
Click Here for
All the Swift Boat Vets Ads!
View for FREE!
http://www2.swiftvets.com/index.php?topic=Ads
Free online version of
John Kerry and the VVAW
"The New Soldier"
Banned by the DNC!
You can read it online right now.
http://ejsmithweb.com/fr/newsoldier/
The Swiftvets news conference on C-SPAN can be found here.
AND other valuable Video and Audio links.
http://www.peteandrews.net/media.htm
"Liar!Liar!Liar!Creepy Liar!" Video
of Democrat losing it on MSNBC!
Lawrence O'Donnell screamed Liar! for 20 minutes!
And attacked John O'Neil
This is just a 3:28 sample of his attack.
PS O'Donnell never served in the military
BUT "knows" all about it?
What a loser!
http://64.91.230.181/~recycler/videos/windbag.WMV
The Children of Viet Nam Veterans Video (Not an easy one to watch)
Please remember the 58,000 + Names on the Wall on Nov 2
Please watch this video
Thank You
http://kerrylied.com/otherdocs/flash.htm
Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick
He was killed by racist democrats.
Does it involve a young George Bush? I have heard a rumour that he was missing for a few hours as a child in Dallas on a November afternoon in 1963. Maybe he did this too! (sarc)!
13 posted on 10/29/2004 8:20:56 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (Kerry: how can we trust him with our money, if Teresa won't trust him with hers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.