Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Yes...that is true but WHY is it the ONLY thing we hear is how Republicans can't win without OHIO???

More media bias in action.


2 posted on 10/29/2004 10:09:37 AM PDT by Illinois Rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Illinois Rep

The Missouri Republicans really need to show up, because a whole lot of long-dead Cardinals and even Browns (baseball) are going to be voting on Tuesday I'll bet.


3 posted on 10/29/2004 10:10:50 AM PDT by perez24 (Dirty deeds, done dirt cheap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Illinois Rep

FOX National Poll Bush 50-Kerry 45-Ohio Bush Up 3
Fox News | 10-29-2004 | my favorite headache


Posted on 10/29/2004 11:51:46 AM


5 posted on 10/29/2004 10:11:07 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Illinois Rep

They liberal MSM can't cover up Hawaii and Missouri forever. Maybe.


7 posted on 10/29/2004 10:13:31 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Illinois Rep

I'm not surprised about anything the liberal MSM says or does anymore.

As well, funny how the naysayers have shown up to say "That's irrelevant" when I post these historical facts about Mo. and Hi.


18 posted on 10/29/2004 10:23:53 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Illinois Rep
Yes...that is true but WHY is it the ONLY thing we hear is how Republicans can't win without OHIO???

That's because Ohio more often than not votes Republican, not because there are not ways of winning without it, or because a Republican winning it guarantees election.. Nixon Release 1.0 in 1960 and Dewey Release 1.0 in 1944 both won Ohio (as did Harrison in 1892), but didn't win the Presidency.

Its also true no Democrat has ever won election without the support of Kentucky. But that doesn't mean they "can't" do so. Kerry could, but won't, this year.

There are lots of these streaks or near streaks out there of states predicting the winner - look at the voting behavior since 1892 of New Mexico (missed 1976 and 2000), Delaware (missed in 1916, 1932, 1948, and 2000), Pennsylvania (not a swing state prior to 1932 - missed 1932, 1948, 1968, 2000), Kentucky (missed 1900, 1904, 1908, 1920, 1952, and 1960) Missouri (missed 1896, 1900, 1956), Ohio (missed in 1892, 1944, 1960), Florida (not a swing state prior to 1924 - missed in 1924, 1960, 1992), New Jersey (missed in 1916, 1948, 1976, 2000), and Michigan (not a swing state prior to 1932 - missed in 1940, 1948, 1968, 1976, 2000). As a whole, they are fairly predictive of election outcomes, which is why they are considered swing states.

Its rather like the habit of Hawaii only going Republican in incumbent reeelections (1972, 1984), or West Virginia since 1920 doing the same until 2000 (1924, 1928, 1956, 1972, 1984)

They are individually about as meaningful as the Redskins winning or losing their last home game determining the President.

26 posted on 10/29/2004 10:45:50 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson