Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Sen. Specter Vows to Block Bush's Nominees.
Newsmax.com ^ | Friday, Oct. 29, 2004 | With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 10/29/2004 3:06:03 PM PDT by zzen01

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: SwinusMaximus

Yes, that is my thought also. As you can probably tell by my lack of memory, he made quite an impression.

Thanks


21 posted on 10/29/2004 3:19:46 PM PDT by NY Attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: zzen01

BTTT


22 posted on 10/29/2004 3:19:49 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zzen01

Spinchter is the dasshole of Pennsylvania.


23 posted on 10/29/2004 3:20:11 PM PDT by hardhead (Liberty Watch - http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/liberty-watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

So did Santoru,..it's an unwritten rule, I guess..I wrote here months ago, during the primary, that in return for the support of Bush and Santorum, Spector had agreed NOT to take the SJC chair..Look..we're gonnahave 2-3 SC jnominations..bloody committee and floor fights...the Senate GOP may go nuclear, and Spector is NOT the guy to lead that.. There is NO way that Frist and other GOP senators would allow that..so, loom for Arlen to step aside..


24 posted on 10/29/2004 3:20:29 PM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude
We tried to stop him, but too many RINOs voted his way, and too many "pragmatists" decided the danger of losing the seat was just too great. To our very great disappointment, both the President and Senator Santorum endorsed him. It was a colossal error. Specter could actually get Bush some votes in the Philadelphia suburbs among the RINOs, but he has refused to reciprocate.

Many of us are voting for Clymer, but big labor is also backing Specter (even over the Democrat, Hoeffel). No matter what the outcome, the Republican leadership needs to take the rare--but not unprecedented--step of telling Specter he will not be appointed chairman of the Judiciary Committee. If he jumps parties as a result, so be it.

Specter is the Republican most responsible for blocking Bork's nomination to the Supreme Court. If not for him, many decisions buttressed by the genuinely incoherent Anthony Kennedy would never have seen the light of day.

25 posted on 10/29/2004 3:20:48 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Wearing BLACK Pajamas, in honor of Hanoi John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moconservative

My guess is that Specter has already been told that he would not get the chairmanship of the judiciary committee that he was in line for. This threat is pay back, most likely.


26 posted on 10/29/2004 3:23:14 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

What I remember of this guy, is that he is self-centered and in it only for himself.


27 posted on 10/29/2004 3:26:15 PM PDT by NY Attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: zzen01

Isn't there an indepedent running???


28 posted on 10/29/2004 3:26:41 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
From a political standpoint, the most important aspect of the Pennsylvania race is that it was crucial to keep the seat in GOP hands. Not because Bush is a Republican, mind you -- but because PA already has one GOP senator, and to the powers in the GOP leadership it is difficult to deal with a state that has two Senators from different parties.

This line of thinking worked in reverse in New Jersey in 2002. When the state Democratic machine pulled its stunt to replace Torricelli with Lautenberg after the ballot deadline, the national GOP party was strangely silent about it -- in a year when control of the Senate was up in the air, no less!

With two Democratic senators in New Jersey and two GOP senators in Pennsylvania, it becomes very easy for the national Republican leadership to really screw one state in the Federal appropriations process while heaping all sorts of financial largesse on the other. For example . . . I can practically guarantee you that New Jersey will get the shaft when it comes to the next round of military base closings; the state's two Democratic senators won't have a single friend in Washington for them to influence in the process.

This is precisely why there weren't too many tears shed in the "Red States" when Rick Lazio lost to Hillary Clinton in the 2000 New York senate race.

29 posted on 10/29/2004 3:28:03 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: zzen01

What he needs is a "magic bullet."


30 posted on 10/29/2004 3:29:05 PM PDT by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zzen01

there's gratitude for ya!


31 posted on 10/29/2004 3:30:05 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zzen01

Heck with it. I'm voting Clymer.


32 posted on 10/29/2004 3:30:12 PM PDT by Glenn (The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zzen01
Spincther is synonymous for haggis ingredients.
33 posted on 10/29/2004 3:31:30 PM PDT by Founding Father
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weshess

Apparently the wise Karl Rove didn't know he shouldn't trust this lying creep.


34 posted on 10/29/2004 3:33:59 PM PDT by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SwinusMaximus; NY Attitude
Specter was a Republican during his two terms as Philadelphia DA. He was the first "Republican" to hold office in the fever swamps of West Camden in about 15 years. Ever the backstabber, he had been a Democrat as assistant DA, but he switched parties to run against his former boss.

In practical terms, did he ever really change parties? His lifetime ACU rating is 43. That puts him behind some Democrats (for example John Breaux). That lifetime rating has actually been increased by his ratings in 2002 (50) and 2003 (63), because, as he is want to do, Specter always cleans up his act in the contract renewal year.

35 posted on 10/29/2004 3:34:57 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Wearing BLACK Pajamas, in honor of Hanoi John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Hoeffel is an ultraliberal. A vote for him will be seen as a vote Specter is not liberal enough. Vote for Jim Clymer, the conservative choice.
36 posted on 10/29/2004 3:35:03 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zzen01
Hey, Arlen


37 posted on 10/29/2004 3:35:44 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Hey, look at me, I'm a math major.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: secessionist

Belonged to the Dems every since he signed off on magic bullet.


38 posted on 10/29/2004 3:36:40 PM PDT by stopillegalimmigration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zzen01
A little pot stirring the weekend before election. Actually the quote below is a good position to take... I'd love to not have any extremist on the Court. I'd say that falls in line very closely with what President Bush has always said about appointing 'strict constitutionalists' to the court.....

"Before the Post-Gazette editorial board, he promised that no extremists would be approved for the bench."

39 posted on 10/29/2004 3:39:53 PM PDT by deport (Texas...... Early Voting in person Oct. 18 thru Oct 29..... vote early and take someone with you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Hoeffel is an idiot. Not saying Specter is anything but electing Hoeffel is electing an empty chair. Remember what counts in the senate.


40 posted on 10/29/2004 3:43:30 PM PDT by donnab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson