I prefer smaller, less intrusive government. I prefer fiscal responsibility. I prefer a government whose members have actually read the Constitution and abide by it. Things that I'm not going to get regardles of who wins the election.
You want me to vote for Bush by trying to make the case that he is the lesser of two evils. Well, the lesser of two evils is still evil, isn't it? So sorry, but I'll be voting my conscience tomorrow. But for what it's worth Bush should still carry my state by 20 points.
Actually why vote for the lesser of two evils
http://www.cthulhu.org/
"I prefer smaller, less intrusive government. I prefer fiscal responsibility. I prefer a government whose members have actually read the Constitution and abide by it." me too.
When close to half of the country doesn't see it as we do, getting what WE want isn't possible. but keeping this nation at status quo until we can turn this corner and bring these "compassionate conservatives"(big spenders) back in line is of the utmost importance. allowing kerry to win by default is not the answer.
by the way. better by a gun to protect your conscience. If Bush loses there's a bigger, more intrusive, government headed your way, that holds the Constitution in contempt.
"You want me to vote for Bush by trying to make the case that he is the lesser of two evils."
Certainly. Any candidate is the 'lesser of two evils'. Conquently, if you only vote for those who are completely without 'evil', then you will never vote. Just ask yourself, do you agree with every thing about any candidate?