Listen, four months ago there were only two candidates; today there are only two candidates.
For your information, I don't use the argument "Kerry would be worse," because that's a fact; I believe in George W. Bush and in what he's doing; he's the president of ALL the people of this country, not just us, and he has to DEAL with all of them.
I think he's doing the best any person could do in the situation he's in; if you don't, fine. But don't be furious at the rest of us because we happen to think things are going pretty well compared to what they could be.
As for living in LaLaLand, that's an insult to me and everybody that doesn't agree with YOUR agenda; you're no better than you accuse us of being. You want your way and you're going to make everybody else miserable trying to get it.
Face the fact that only about two percent of conservatives want the slash and burn policies most of you want; it's not that we don't know things are wrong -- we just don't feel like setting fire to our hair every single time somebody who doesn't agree with Bush comes along.
And why do you need US to tell you to write the president? Can't you figure that out for yourselves? I don't suppose it ever occurred to you that we DO write the president when we don't agree with him, huh? The difference is that we write him when we DO agree with him, too.
As for the remark about Bush being elevated to a diety, that's just as childish as you say we are; we SUPPORT him and we're sick and tired of NOTHING he does being supported by you all.
If you don't think Kerry would be worse, we don't have much in common.