Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush back up 11,000 in New Mexico

Posted on 11/03/2004 1:56:12 AM PST by guitar Josh

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/NM/P/00/index.html


TOPICS: Government; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/03/2004 1:56:13 AM PST by guitar Josh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/NM/P/00/index.html


2 posted on 11/03/2004 1:57:46 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh

How recent is this?


3 posted on 11/03/2004 1:58:15 AM PST by Necrovore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh

What, are we up to 115% of all precincts reporting now?


4 posted on 11/03/2004 1:58:18 AM PST by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Necrovore

just changed a few minutes ago.


5 posted on 11/03/2004 1:58:49 AM PST by Kimlee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh

Maybe they corrected a "double counting" of some batch of votes?

That is the kind of mistake somebody could make, doing manual calculations, or plugging extra numbers into a computer spreadsheet.


6 posted on 11/03/2004 1:59:05 AM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh

And still 20,000 provisionals in NM still.


7 posted on 11/03/2004 1:59:38 AM PST by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh
I got burned posting from New Mexico's official site (pulled thread because it was wrong -- old).

Bush should win. But CNN has the votes in the 300K range (Bush up by 11K as this post states). But Fox TV shows the votes in the 200K range.

And earlier I saw the 103% precincts reporting at CNN. Then it was down to 98%.

Last time New Mexico was well ahead for Bush but Gore won by a few hundred by the light of day -- or a few days recounting and recounting.

It stinks all around. Even if Bush wins it, it stinks.

8 posted on 11/03/2004 2:00:16 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh

Notice the places where we are not at 100% counts? Yes, they are all Kerry counties. Which means, they will dig up as many votes as it takes for Kerry to win by a few thousand....boy, that was close, but I'm glad we took the time needed to make sure every vote is counted..........what a crock!

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/NM/P/00/county.000.html


9 posted on 11/03/2004 2:01:20 AM PST by nimar (If not the US, then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh

They won't call NM for Bush when he is up 11,000 votes in a state of 600,000 total votes and all but 15 precincts reporting.

But... they call Wisconsin for Kerry when he is up by 13,000 votes in a state of 3,000,000 votes and 24 precincts not reporting.


10 posted on 11/03/2004 2:01:43 AM PST by TheLooseThread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh

They won't call NM for Bush when he is up 11,000 votes in a state of 600,000 total votes and all but 15 precincts reporting.

But... they call Wisconsin for Kerry when he is up by 13,000 votes in a state of 3,000,000 votes and 24 precincts not reporting.


11 posted on 11/03/2004 2:02:55 AM PST by TheLooseThread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Necrovore

And stupid CNN decides to make it a "green" state, and when did they make it a green state, after the WH asked them to declare NM in the Bush column. But suddenly it's too close to call, even though Bush is ahead by 11,000 votes, and Ohio is too close to call even though Bush is ahead by 144,000 votes.

When America wakes up and see this garbage, especially the Ohio debacle, they'll be mad.

They think the Republicans won big this time, wait till next, when the electorate will see fit to give the Republicans wider margins so they won't try to cheat again.


12 posted on 11/03/2004 2:04:46 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh

In 2000 the final margin in NM was;

Bush 286,417
Gore 286,783

Looks like there have been alot more votes cast this year, or perhaps more accurately, alot more votes counted this year...

Name Party Votes Pct
Bush, George (i) Rep 333,525 50.26
Kerry, John Dem 322,571 48.61

So;

2000: 573K

2004(so far): 656K

or a 15% increase...

2000


13 posted on 11/03/2004 2:05:49 AM PST by swilhelm73 (We've found more WMDs in Iraq than we've found disenfranchised blacks in Florida. --Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
Somebody plugged 24,000 Kerry votes into something, certainly. But they didn't re-disappear as any kind of mistake. Nor did they fit any pattern of anything else that happened at any time during the night up until then.
14 posted on 11/03/2004 2:06:41 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh
THE ENTIRE MEDIA...FOX NEWS INCLUDED...ARE GUTLESS FREAKING WONDERS. IF THESE LEADS IN NEW MEXICO, IOWA AND OHIO WERE 99% PRECINCTS REPORTING WITH SEVERAL THOUSAND VOTES AHEAD, THEY WOULD ALL BE CALLING THE ELECTION FOR JOHN KERRY AND URGING PRESIDENT BUSH TO BE A GOOD LOSER!

Instead, we see Tom Brokenjaw say the Democrats have a "right" to do this....

What a bunch of crap.

I don't know what is happening at Nevada...but put that in for Bush, too.

What a bunch of PANSIES.

15 posted on 11/03/2004 2:08:08 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh

I read on the Drudge Yahoo real time that New Mexico had a 103% of the votes in and still counting!

Bush was leading inspite of the Dems stack deck!

Now New Mexico adjusted it votes

99% 50B-49K

What happen to the 103% votes in and before that Bush was 51B/48K

It could have been more that Bush was leading!


16 posted on 11/03/2004 2:08:55 AM PST by restornu (By faith Bush subdued kingdoms, wrought righteousness, and worked miracles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitar Josh
Bush back up 11,000 in New Mexico

Bush back up 11,000 in New Old Mexico

17 posted on 11/03/2004 2:10:59 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Well I am forced to conclude that this little 24,000 'hiccup' in NM and the fact that they have quit counting for the night means that along with a similar problem in 2 counties in Iowa means that this is just what is needed to deny Bush the Presidency if Ohio is stil to be litigated I Dont belive in political coincidences You can smell this unfold by the hour


18 posted on 11/03/2004 2:13:55 AM PST by Armigerous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Armigerous

You just have to look at this the right way.

Picture a cartoon, with Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck, both of them standing next to the open trunk of their cars, pulling out sacks of ballots. Every time one of them pulls out a sack, the other one pulls out a bigger sack.

The problem for the Demonrats is, Bugs *always* wins - and that's us, wascally Wepubwican wabbits...


19 posted on 11/03/2004 2:21:50 AM PST by fire_eye (Socialism is the opiate of academia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson