Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

New York only serves one purpose in the larger scheme of things in the U.S. The high cost of living and correspondingly high income levels in that state (along with all the other Northeastern "blue" states) ensure that the "real" United States has a steady stream of Federal revenue to pursue their own interests.


6 posted on 11/03/2004 8:39:54 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
New York only serves one purpose in the larger scheme of things in the U.S. The high cost of living and correspondingly high income levels in that state (along with all the other Northeastern "blue" states) ensure that the "real" United States has a steady stream of Federal revenue to pursue their own interests.

I really don't understand why my liberal neighbors and the people they elect don't understand this. Hillary! and Schumer certainly haven't voted to lower the taxes of so-called "rich" New Yorkers. If you make $100,000 a year in New York City, you live in a small apartment or house with a small yard. If you make $100,000 - or even $50,000 -- a year in Oklahoma City, you live like a king.
19 posted on 11/03/2004 5:26:10 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson