To: neverdem
New York only serves one purpose in the larger scheme of things in the U.S. The high cost of living and correspondingly high income levels in that state (along with all the other Northeastern "blue" states) ensure that the "real" United States has a steady stream of Federal revenue to pursue their own interests.
6 posted on
11/03/2004 8:39:54 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
(I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
To: Alberta's Child
New York only serves one purpose in the larger scheme of things in the U.S. The high cost of living and correspondingly high income levels in that state (along with all the other Northeastern "blue" states) ensure that the "real" United States has a steady stream of Federal revenue to pursue their own interests.
I really don't understand why my liberal neighbors and the people they elect don't understand this. Hillary! and Schumer certainly haven't voted to lower the taxes of so-called "rich" New Yorkers. If you make $100,000 a year in New York City, you live in a small apartment or house with a small yard. If you make $100,000 - or even $50,000 -- a year in Oklahoma City, you live like a king.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson