Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crv16

According to this extremely exit poll of those who post here, here is what we are looking at, a combination of the following:

Pro Lifers

Frist
Romney
Santorum
Owens

Pro aborts

Giuliani
Rice


All in all, I am inclined to think that Romney brings the same strengths to the ticket as Giuliani. He puts MA and MI into play, though we would likely only take one of those. Giuliani puts NY into play.

Both have hold your nose factors, but it's different for Giuliani than for Romney. For Romney it's a religious test for evangelicals (I don't think the religious test is the same for Catholics). He passes (I believe) the pro life test.

Rudy fails the pro life test. That is a harder pill for religious conservatives to swallow.

I love Owens, but I think CO and that divorce hurt him.

I think I would like to amend my previous post. The ticket must be Romney/Santorum. They have the looks, the EV's and the conservative bona fides.

The D's are gonna crap.


111 posted on 11/03/2004 1:00:15 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeDude

Mitt Romney ran for governor in 2002 as a pro-choice candidate. He's in favor of the ban on partial-birth abortion, and maybe parental notification laws, but he's not a pro-lifer. Besides, he wouldn't be able to carry his home state of Massachusetts (and his other home state, Utah, is already in the bag).

Santorum is the man. He gets us Pennsylvania, keeps WV and OH safe, and helps us with Catholics in other swing states.


130 posted on 11/03/2004 1:06:50 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson