Posted on 11/03/2004 1:28:46 PM PST by stcromwell99
We need to pursue the petition to get him thrown out of office. We need Congressional Hearings to find out how such a person could have EVER been able to sit in our hallowed halls. And if anyone thinks he is done with his anti-war movements they have got to be kidding themselves. He has caused with his rhetoric to get elected. We were united and he was the divider. He needs to be held accountable.
The Swiftvets should not let up until the traitor is run-out of the US Senate in disgrace.
What makes you think they don't know?
I agree with you that President Bush never stooped to slime levels.
However, I think he won because the people finally got it--to put it simply--they finally came to realize he was selfish.
That's kind of a paradox, Mud.
I mean if the quisling-mediots don't report something it ain't so to a large number of Americans.
That might change one day, but it ain't so now.
Be that as it may if the Chief wants to skewer the guy's hide even more, I say go for it.
But I'd urge the man to be damned careful while working around sKerry's corpse, too.
And whatever he does!!
...leave the *stake* alone! :o)
Count me in!
Now is time for Hanoi Kerry to pay for his treason!
'The Federalist' website has submitted a petition to Congress and the Attorney General with 180,000 signers on October 18th for action after the election. Since then over 7,000 additional have signed. Petition to Investigate and Indict John F. Kerry for acts of treason:
Though John Kerry has an extensive and well-documented record of anti-American activities over the past three decades, it is his acts of treason in 1970-71 that are the subject of this petition for indictment. Our appeal notes both Kerry's violations of the UCMJ (Article 104 part 904) and U.S. Code (18 USC Sec. 2381 and 18 USC Sec. 953), and calls for his disqualification for public office in accordance with the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, which states: "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President ... having previously taken an oath ... to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof." Why prosecute John Kerry now? In October 2003, Mr. Kerry chose to make his Vietnam war record the centerpiece of his campaign for the presidency; this has been especially true since his primary victory in March 2004. In response, more than 165,000 signatories of the above-referenced petition for indictment have made his war record the centerpiece of their campaign to disqualify Kerry from public office. We understand that no action is likely to be taken on this petition until after the 02 November election. Be it known, however, that on 03 November, we will seek full recourse in an effort to have John Kerry prosecuted for acts of treason and disqualified from any future campaign for any national office. We are thus committed to holding Mr. Kerry accountable for his actions, as there is no statute of limitations for acts of treason.
More at http://patriotpetitions.com
PASS IT ON TO OTHERS...
I gave a bunch myself and figured it was money well spent. I actually think the Swifties won this election. But, now the situation is different and it's time to change the attack.
I'd say start with getting Chrissy Matthews (and his pal Lawrence O'Donnell) off the air.
"I just think that a lot of the people who voted for him would be shocked to know about his traitorous activities, and that he hid a less-than-honorable discharge."
And those people have the right to know how the MSM was a willing accomplice in hiding all this too. What they do with that info is their business.
I think the Swifties have handled this and themselves with grace, courage and patience. I trust them to continue to act in the same manner...
Hey skerry - the truth is gonna set you free!
> If the Mass voters didn't kick out Teddy after he killed
> a woman, they sure aren't going to unseat this miserable
> piece of crap with whom they largely agree.
Kennedy was a Kennedy.
Being "a Kerry" carries no such cachet.
And if the "Forbes" connection is fully exposed, people
might get further disturbed.
But suppose the MA voters discover that JfK cost them the
honor of having another MA POTUS because he lied to them
about his personal history? They might resent that.
Exactly. An arrogant effete snob that was "owed" the position.
Can someone sum up for me what is supposed to be wrong with Kerry's war record?
Was he or was he not decorated for his service?
And you are the one who stated forcefully that Kerry wasn't really resigning, that he was going to count every vote and not to trust him because he will take back the concession.
So, you didn't trust him three hours ago, but you trust him now, is that it??
Like I said to Lady Lawyer, what makes you think they don't know? I think the whole country knows that kerry is a liar and a political opportunist. It's just that the Libs think that is politics as usual. We don't.
He is a liar, a liar you hear, a liar, a terrible liar. Just ask Larry O'Donnell MSNBC how to say it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.