Who are you referring to?
The President, of course.
Particularly given the fact he lied through his teeth about his program's being restricted to the 60 stem cell lines, I see no reason that "government funding" or a killed-by date of August, 2001 should be the bright line of Circumstance which determines whether or not "humanitarian" use of embryos that would have been tossed in the garbage is legitimate or not.
When your "pro-life" President, even, can "pray" to his Favorite Philosopher that he's done the right thing by etching in stone with government funds the Fact that all men are no longer created equal ...
And when your "pro-life" President's decision obviates the need for the NIH to even proffer human experimentation protocols for review (the President's decision having nailed open a whole new door of human Non-Personhood, according to the Congressional Register) ...
It seems hypocritical in the extreme to balk at California's making good on its promise to become the world's prime supplier of Potential People suitable for all manner of human experimentation so long as -- so far as anyone knows -- they're destroyed by "implantation" age.
You all lost this fight when you rationalized the President's decision. Perhaps if you really cared, you'd understand that you lost the fight back in 1970 when -- among other extremely curious findings with regard to the environment, population control and depopulation -- the GOP discovered a "right" to predetermine the sex of one's children.
The truth is out there. Staring you in the face. If you care to look.