Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Life Pray-In Planned to Stop Specter
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 11/05/04 | Erin Brezsnyak

Posted on 11/05/2004 5:00:56 PM PST by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - Several Christian groups announced Friday that they would conduct a "pray-in" to protest the possible appointment of Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Arlen Specter to chair the Senate Judiciary Committee. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) is expected to decide who will succeed Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) as head of the panel.

Specter faces growing opposition from conservatives determined to keep him from ascending to chairmanship of the committee that would handle any new nominations President Bush makes to the U.S. Supreme Court, because Specter supports abortion rights.

"We urge people to contact Senator Frist and let him know that the president needs a loyal man at the helm of the Judiciary Committee, and that man is not Senator Specter," Rev. Pat Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition, said in a statement.

Specter, whose support of abortion rights was already well known, angered conservatives this week when he appeared to be delivering a warning to President Bush about possible Supreme Court nominations during a second Bush term.

On Wednesday, following the reelection of President Bush, Specter warned President Bush against choosing future Supreme Court nominees who would seek to overturn abortion laws or would be too conservative to be confirmed.

"When you talk about judges who would change the right of a woman to choose, overturn Roe v. Wade, I think that is unlikely," the Houston Chronicle quoted Specter as saying.

"The president is well aware of what happened when a bunch of his nominees were sent up, with the filibuster...and I would expect the president to be mindful of the considerations which I am mentioning," the Chronicle quoted him as saying.

However, on Thursday Specter refuted these remarks, saying, "Contrary to press accounts, I did not warn the president about anything and was very respectful of his constitutional authority on the appointment of federal judges.

"As the record shows, I have supported every one of President Bush's nominees in the Judiciary Committee and on the Senate floor. I have never and would never apply any litmus test on the abortion issue..." Specter added.

In an interview with CNSNews.com, Mahoney said Evangelicals, pro-family and pro-life groups are not comfortable with Specter chairing the Judiciary because the confirmation of judges is a key component to the Christian social agenda.

"Senator Specter has said in the past many of the comments that he made yesterday before his retraction. I think it's clear to all of us involved that Senator Specter just sent out that news release to save his job as chairperson of the head of Judiciary," said Mahoney.

"Senator Specter cannot be the Chair of Judiciary Committee. There's no trust. There's no confidence. He has burned a bridge which cannot be repaired," he said.

"You can't undo in one news release years and years of comments and things that he has said all along in lectures, to media, on radio shows. It's clear that Senator Specter believes that Roe v. Wade is a federal part of law and must never be overturned,"
Mahoney continued.

Mahoney also told CNSNews.com

that outside of abortion and family issues, the number three issue Christians are concerned with is activist judges, even though the press hasn't picked up on it.

Dr. James Dobson, founder and chairman of Focus on the Family, also expressed opposition to Specter. In a statement issued Thursday regarding Specter's first set of comments, Dobson accused Specter of "political bullying" and "arrogant grandstanding."

Christopher Norfleet of Focus on the Family told CNSNews.com on Friday that Dobson was sticking by his statements even after reading the new comments by Specter.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.




TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: prolife; specter

1 posted on 11/05/2004 5:00:56 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I'm glad to see others praying too. Thanks for posting.


2 posted on 11/05/2004 5:16:27 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I've got a comeback for those who insist that Roe v. Wade is permanent, and shouldn't be changed: Dred Scott. Most laws should be kept as they are, unless they need to be changed, but there have to be exceptions, and abortion and the proscription of gay marriage have to be our goals. I believe that a way can be made to get around Spector, whether that is to prevent him from sitting on the Judiciary, (since, despite his statement to the contrary, he will have a limus test for all nominees), or to work around him some way by selecting a pro-life Dem (is there any such thing anymore?) to sit on the Judiciary committee to cancel out Spector.

Unlike most on here, I have no animus against Spector...I love Republican Jews. But if he intends to thwart the overturn of Roe v. Wade, he should be dealt with, even if he and R.I. Senator Chafee leave the party. If they are RINOs on this of all issues, let's do the right thing, even if it results in a reduction of the number of GOP Senators.....

3 posted on 11/05/2004 5:17:42 PM PST by Malcolm (there is no substitute for good manners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm
I've got a comeback for those who insist that Roe v. Wade is permanent, and shouldn't be changed: Dred Scott.

That one has a strong moral force, but there's a better precedent, one which the courts are more likely to notice. It's Plessy v. Ferguson, the case which established legal segregation for a much longer time than abortion has been legal. If that doesn't work, the courts might well notice that Bowers v. Hardwick, the Roe-era Supreme Court decision allowing states to ban gay sex, was overthrown after the pro-abortion crowd itself insisted that precedent was not a good reason for keeping bad decisions on the record.

4 posted on 11/05/2004 6:18:49 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

If Arlen Specter takes the Chair of the Judiciary Committee we could be living with his mistakes for the next 30 years or longer.

We can't take that chance, we need a good man in there working for Republican ideals, not concerned that Teddy Kennedy might not like what we're doing.

Arlen Specter must get the vote of his peers on the committee, be sure to let them know how you feel.

Judiciary Committee

Majority Leader Bill Frist 202-224-3344 or 615-352-9411

Orrin Hatch (202) 224-5251
Charles Grassley (202)224.3744
Jon Kyl (202) 224-4521
Mike DeWine (202) 224-2315
Jeff Sessions (202) 224-4124
Lindsey Graham (202) 224-5972
Larry Craig 202/224-2752
Saxby Chambliss (202) 224-3521
John Cornyn 202-224-2934


5 posted on 11/05/2004 6:54:29 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I sometimes wonder if Bush weakened Specter and them rode in to save him from the big bad Toomey.


6 posted on 11/05/2004 7:07:31 PM PST by rottweiller_inc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm; madprof98; kattracks; RJL; blackie
The debate over the chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee still rages. In one development, Planned Parenthood is asking its activists to thank Senator Arlen Specter (R. Penn.) for his “moderate” stance on abortion. In light of this continuing debate, The American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property (TFP) opposes his nomination.

Senator Specter’s voting record and recent statements to the press disqualify him from heading the Judiciary Committee. Senator Specter has been outspoken in stating that he will do everything in his power to thwart a Supreme Court reversal of Roe v. Wade.

Scuttle Specter's Chairmanship Hopes

7 posted on 12/10/2004 4:36:56 AM PST by The_Eaglet (Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet

Watch Specter like a hawk ~ Bump!


8 posted on 12/10/2004 10:12:04 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blackie
Watch Specter like a hawk ~ Bump!

Do you know what hawks do to rats?

9 posted on 12/10/2004 10:25:51 AM PST by The_Eaglet (Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet

Kill 'em. :)


10 posted on 12/10/2004 10:26:40 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson