Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gonzales considers Supreme Court's future
Houston Chronicle ^ | Nov. 5, 2004 | KRISTEN MACK

Posted on 11/06/2004 9:52:32 AM PST by Max Combined

Bush counsel is listing potential justice nominees, but he won't say if he's one of them

White House counsel Alberto Gonzales is developing a list of possible Supreme Court nominees in case vacancies occur during President Bush's second term, but Gonzales wouldn't say Friday whether he's on the list.

"I've got a great job and I'm focusing on it," he told the Houston Chronicle after a luncheon appearance in the city.

Gonzales, who was on the Texas Supreme Court before Bush tapped him for the administration job, often is mentioned as a high-court prospect.

He also is considered a possible successor to Attorney General John Ashcroft if Ashcroft doesn't stay for Bush's second term.

Gonzales would be the first Hispanic in either job.

He and his colleagues in his office have spent a lot of time on potential Supreme Court nominees, Gonzales said. He says he feels good about the recommendations, but the decision ultimately belongs to the president.

"George W. Bush has given me several once-in-a-lifetime opportunities," he said at the luncheon Friday for the American Leadership Forum, Houston/Gulf Coast Chapter. The organization presented him its Exemplary Leader award.

Gonzales was born in San Antonio and raised in Houston.

In his speech, Gonzales gave an insider's account of Election Night at the highest levels of the administration.

"We knew it was going to be very close, quite frankly," he said.

He attended a meeting with the president and other key staff members at 2 p.m. Tuesday, when Bush returned to the White House from Texas. They looked over exit polls that caused them a little concern, Gonzales said.

Gonzales went back to the White House around 4 a.m. and ran into White House Chief of Staff Andy Card, who was preparing to announce on national television that the president would make a statement later in the day. Speculation at the time was that it would be a declaration of victory.

Gonzales' wife called him later that morning with the news that the Democratic nominee, U.S. Sen. John Kerry, had conceded, which was confirmed moments later by Karl Rove, Bush's political strategist.

"I can't tell you about the pride of winning in a hard-fought contest," Gonzales said. Not winning would have been a sign from the voters that "what you did was not good enough or successful."

Right now, Gonzales said, he feels vindicated.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/06/2004 9:52:32 AM PST by Max Combined
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

Yes, put Gonzalez up for the Court! Let the Rats oppose him!

We got 45% of the Hispaniac vote! With a little more work we can take a majority. Let the Dems take the Blacks, the Hispanics already outnumber them and are pulling away.


2 posted on 11/06/2004 10:10:32 AM PST by OwnershipSociety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined
2000: Cheney prepares list of potential vice presidential candidates

2004: Gonzales prepared list of potential Supreme Court justices

3 posted on 11/06/2004 10:13:22 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

4 posted on 11/06/2004 10:19:22 AM PST by doug from upland (Michael Moore = a culinary Pinocchio ---- tell a lie, gain a pound.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

Unfortunately, I am uncertain of Mr. Gonzales' conservative credentials.


5 posted on 11/06/2004 10:21:06 AM PST by IStillBelieve (G.W. Bush '04: Biggest popular vote victory in history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
2000: Cheney prepares list of potential vice presidential candidates

2004: Gonzales prepared list of potential Supreme Court justices

Good catch.

6 posted on 11/06/2004 10:21:36 AM PST by TexasNative2000 (When it's all said and done, someone starts another conversation.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IStillBelieve
"Unfortunately, I am uncertain of Mr. Gonzales' conservative credentials."

Neither is the Left.That is why he can get confirmed. We just have to trust Dubya's judgment if he nominates him.
7 posted on 11/06/2004 10:45:41 AM PST by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez
Gonzales is NOT a conservative, and he would break your heart. His record on the Texas Supreme Court included some votes that would make O'Connor proud. We don't want him.
8 posted on 11/06/2004 10:50:39 AM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

The President seems to have a lot of faith and trust in this man. That's a good enough endorsement for me.


9 posted on 11/06/2004 10:52:43 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timmy

Further, it was Gonzales who was the pro-affirmative action advocate in the White House that succeeded in watering down the Administration's position in the University of Michigan cases last term. That to me disqualifies him for the appointment. If Bush wants to choose a hispanic, he is far better off with U.S. Appeals Court Judge Emilio Garza...


10 posted on 11/06/2004 12:17:12 PM PST by larlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: larlaw

"If Bush wants to choose a hispanic, he is far better off with U.S. Appeals Court Judge Emilio Garza..."



Or perhaps Miguel Estrada.


11 posted on 11/06/2004 3:45:18 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

12 posted on 11/06/2004 3:49:13 PM PST by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Agreed....Miguel Estrada would be a great choice, both substantively and symbolically.


13 posted on 11/06/2004 10:40:56 PM PST by larlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson