ABOUT THOSE FALSE EXIT POLLS

Fiedor Report On the News #324 ^ | 11-7-04 | Doug Fiedor

[Doc On The Bay]

It was a "Setup;" Pollsters at that level DO NOT make "Mistakes" of the Caliber of the Early "W" election.

There was a CLEAR, Insufferably Illegal effort by a "Polling Organization" to SUPPRESS the Republican Vote.

I HOPE that "W" lets the AG "Go After these Guys!!

NO ONE should have the "Power" to influence an American Election.

'Though they Failed, the fact that they Tried--& Might Have Succeeded--means that Their "ILLEGAL Effort" should be STOPPED, & the "Perpetrators" should be Incarcerated.

I was Taught that ANY ATTEMPT to Alter, or Interfere with an American Election is a FELONY!

I Believe that the Early--Utterly Inaccurate--"Pollsters" in this Presidential Election REQUIRE Serious Scrutiny!!

There's a LOT of suspicion that they attempted to influence the election!

Perhaps it's ABOUT TIME that the "Not-so-subtle" connection between the MSM & the 'Dems was Unmasked!!

It Appears that--after the re-election of "W"--the "Charade" is OVER.

Nonetheless, it's Time we FULLY UNMASKED the "MSM!"

Doc

[Vinomori]

What voter does not vote because he hears his candidate is losing? Not a conservative voter. We vote no matter what. So their miscalculation was based on assuming we thought like they think. It backfired badly in more ways than one. First, it gave Kerry people false hope before they were devastated by the truth. That's a true wake up call. Second, it reduced the credibility of the old media even further. No longer could RatherGate be viewed as a single big error. The old media will lose more and more ground as we go. Another nail is this: they think Hillary is a viable major star candidate. She is not. She is hated with a passion, and she is absolutely unsuited to lead the war on terror. She is less
suited than Kerry was.

[aberaussie]

bttt