Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's Landslide or How Kerry won Ohio [looks at vote differentials 2004 v 2000
Daily Recycler ^ | 11/5/2004

Posted on 11/07/2004 7:08:59 AM PST by motife

The Daily Recycler

Friday, November 05, 2004

Bush's Landslide: Or, How Kerry Won Ohio

In 2000 Bush received 329,708 votes in West Virginia. Gore received 291,088.

In 2004 there were 118,996 more voters than in 2000.

Of those new voters 88,443 voted for Bush and 30,553 went for Kerry; Which is a net gain of 57,890 for Bush in 2004.

We applied the same formula to all 50 states, and declared a winner of each state's electoral votes based on who won the difference in 2004 over 2000.

Kerry had a built-in advantage in that there was a substantial shift away from Ralph Nader during the last four years that favored him. Nevertheless, Bush devastated Kerry inside these margins.

When the new data is applied to the electoral college, this is what it looks like:



Kerry won 11 states, the District of Columbia, and lost fewer Gore voters in Washington State than Bush lost from 2000.



Bush won 37 states, and lost fewer of his California voters than Kerry lost of Gore's California voters from 2000.



The 2000 election data was taken from CNN, and the 2004 election data was taken from Yahoo. We're not sure if Washington State and California actually lost voters from 2000, or if that data just hasn't been updated at Yahoo.

Some more interesting thoughts on the 2004 election results from ACK!.

posted by The Recycler at 3:45 PM

|

Wednesday, November 03, 2004

Portrait of the Paranoid Mind




Transcript

Ratherbiased.com asked us to host this video because they're being FARK'd right now.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushvictory; stats

1 posted on 11/07/2004 7:09:00 AM PST by motife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: motife
Here are the state's Bush most increased his %age in, 2004% Bush, 2000% Bush, and %change :

1 HI ----- 45.63% ----- 37.79% ----- 7.84%
2 RI ----- 39.14% ----- 32.23% ----- 6.91%
3 NJ ----- 46.62% ----- 40.54% ----- 6.08%
4 AL ----- 62.69% ----- 56.97% ----- 5.73%
5 TN ----- 57.01% ----- 51.46% ----- 5.55%
6 CT ----- 44.40% ----- 38.92% ----- 5.47%
7 NY ----- 40.58% ----- 35.58% ----- 5.00%
8 OK ----- 65.56% ----- 61.08% ----- 4.48%
9 MA ----- 37.30% ----- 32.92% ----- 4.38%
10 NE ----- 66.98% ----- 62.86% ----- 4.11%
11 WV ----- 56.22% ----- 52.36% ----- 3.87%
12 LA ----- 57.17% ----- 53.30% ----- 3.86%
13 DE ----- 45.92% ----- 42.16% ----- 3.76%
14 KS ----- 62.53% ----- 58.84% ----- 3.69%
15 UT ----- 72.01% ----- 68.32% ----- 3.69%
16 AZ ----- 55.26% ----- 51.67% ----- 3.58%
17 FL ----- 52.30% ----- 49.18% ----- 3.12%
18 MD ----- 43.54% ----- 40.42% ----- 3.12%
19 IN ----- 60.54% ----- 57.51% ----- 3.04%
20 KY ----- 59.71% ----- 56.86% ----- 2.85%
21 MO ----- 53.67% ----- 50.86% ----- 2.81%
22 GA ----- 58.42% ----- 55.69% ----- 2.73%
23 CA ----- 44.79% ----- 42.11% ----- 2.69%
24 AR ----- 54.65% ----- 52.02% ----- 2.63%
25 IL ----- 45.01% ----- 42.86% ----- 2.15%
26 NM ----- 50.31% ----- 48.18% ----- 2.13%
27 PA ----- 48.87% ----- 46.84% ----- 2.03%
28 AK ----- 62.80% ----- 60.84% ----- 1.96%
29 TX ----- 61.51% ----- 59.64% ----- 1.87%
30 MS ----- 59.93% ----- 58.12% ----- 1.81%
31 MN ----- 47.92% ----- 46.15% ----- 1.77%
32 MI ----- 48.03% ----- 46.42% ----- 1.61%
33 IA ----- 50.26% ----- 48.71% ----- 1.54%
34 WI ----- 49.53% ----- 48.06% ----- 1.47%
35 VA ----- 54.35% ----- 52.96% ----- 1.39%
36 SC ----- 58.49% ----- 57.30% ----- 1.20%
37 WA ----- 46.04% ----- 45.08% ----- 0.95%
38 OR ----- 48.03% ----- 47.22% ----- 0.81%
39 CO ----- 52.34% ----- 51.58% ----- 0.76%
40 OH ----- 51.25% ----- 50.51% ----- 0.74%
41 ND ----- 63.14% ----- 62.53% ----- 0.61%
42 ME ----- 45.02% ----- 44.53% ----- 0.50%
43 NV ----- 51.03% ----- 50.55% ----- 0.48%
44 NH ----- 48.99% ----- 48.67% ----- 0.32%
45 DC ----- 9.31% ----- 9.01% ----- 0.30%
46 ID ----- 69.29% ----- 69.06% ----- 0.23%
47 WY ----- 69.50% ----- 69.44% ----- 0.06%
48 MT ----- 59.66% ----- 59.78% ----- -0.12%
49 NC ----- 56.29% ----- 56.46% ----- -0.18%
50 SD ----- 60.23% ----- 61.61% ----- -1.38%
51 VT ----- 39.10% ----- 41.42% ----- -2.32%

2 posted on 11/07/2004 7:13:51 AM PST by motife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife

It would be interesting to extrapolate the 2000-2004 Bush/Kerry vote trends to figure out which states will be red and which states blue in '08.


3 posted on 11/07/2004 7:18:20 AM PST by IStillBelieve (G.W. Bush '04: Biggest popular vote victory in history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife

This is very interesting. Thank you much for posting!


4 posted on 11/07/2004 7:20:16 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife
Here are the states ranked in order of increased vote total (GOP, Dem, Nader only), 2004 v 2000 :

1 FL ----- 7,563,055 ----- 5,922,531 ----- 1,640,524
2 TX ----- 7,346,779 ----- 6,371,379 ----- 975,400
3 OH ----- 5,455,811 ----- 4,655,256 ----- 800,555
4 PA ----- 5,640,194 ----- 4,870,486 ----- 769,708
5 GA ----- 3,235,030 ----- 2,549,382 ----- 685,648
6 MI ----- 4,802,252 ----- 4,207,722 ----- 594,530
7 NC ----- 3,395,094 ----- 2,888,855 ----- 506,239
8 IL ----- 5,140,172 ----- 4,712,206 ----- 427,966
9 WI ----- 2,982,381 ----- 2,574,336 ----- 408,045
10 MN ----- 2,807,269 ----- 2,404,621 ----- 402,648
11 MO ----- 2,706,594 ----- 2,339,577 ----- 367,017
12 TN ----- 2,423,945 ----- 2,063,450 ----- 360,495
13 VA ----- 3,067,452 ----- 2,714,178 ----- 353,274
14 CO ----- 2,041,078 ----- 1,713,409 ----- 327,669
15 IN ----- 2,435,374 ----- 2,166,347 ----- 269,027
16 KY ----- 1,791,023 ----- 1,534,582 ----- 256,441
17 OK ----- 1,463,732 ----- 1,218,613 ----- 245,119
18 NJ ----- 3,405,428 ----- 3,167,577 ----- 237,851
19 AL ----- 1,873,119 ----- 1,652,107 ----- 221,012
20 NV ----- 813,096 ----- 596,561 ----- 216,535
21 SC ----- 1,579,951 ----- 1,371,698 ----- 208,253
22 OR ----- 1,713,908 ----- 1,511,276 ----- 202,632
23 MA ----- 2,861,079 ----- 2,668,553 ----- 192,526
24 LA ----- 1,926,517 ----- 1,740,688 ----- 185,829
25 IA ----- 1,485,544 ----- 1,302,264 ----- 183,280
26 MD ----- 2,186,477 ----- 2,013,347 ----- 173,130
27 NM ----- 739,841 ----- 594,451 ----- 145,390
28 MS ----- 1,119,687 ----- 985,580 ----- 134,107
29 AZ ----- 1,643,538 ----- 1,512,638 ----- 130,900
30 NY ----- 6,884,539 ----- 6,755,101 ----- 129,438
31 AR ----- 1,036,866 ----- 909,129 ----- 127,737
32 NH ----- 675,314 ----- 562,105 ----- 113,209
33 CT ----- 1,547,297 ----- 1,441,561 ----- 105,736
34 ID ----- 589,174 ----- 487,866 ----- 101,308
35 WV ----- 743,743 ----- 642,652 ----- 101,091
36 UT ----- 850,749 ----- 753,999 ----- 96,750
37 ME ----- 733,760 ----- 643,694 ----- 90,066
38 KS ----- 1,147,399 ----- 1,057,694 ----- 89,705
39 SD ----- 386,087 ----- 309,504 ----- 76,583
40 HI ----- 425,427 ----- 364,754 ----- 60,673
41 DE ----- 373,569 ----- 325,663 ----- 47,906
42 MT ----- 444,979 ----- 401,741 ----- 43,238
43 NE ----- 725,294 ----- 690,182 ----- 35,112
44 ND ----- 310,401 ----- 279,622 ----- 30,779
45 WY ----- 240,483 ----- 213,053 ----- 27,430
46 VT ----- 308,757 ----- 289,171 ----- 19,586
47 RI ----- 413,051 ----- 405,115 ----- 7,936
48 DC ----- 204,201 ----- 200,572 ----- 3,629
49 WA ----- 2,455,593 ----- 2,459,518 ----- (3,925)
50 AK ----- 241,830 ----- 275,149 ----- (33,319)
51 CA ----- 9,830,550 ----- 10,847,339 ----- (1,016,789)
tot ST ----- 116,214,483 ----- 104,338,854 ----- 11,875,629

5 posted on 11/07/2004 7:23:04 AM PST by motife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IStillBelieve


The matchup makes a huge difference.. I don't think you can project for 2008 based on 00 and 04.


6 posted on 11/07/2004 7:23:23 AM PST by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IStillBelieve

For example, Kerry beat Bush by over a million votes in NY, so closing the gap by another 300 thousand wouldn't flip NY from blue to red in '08.

On the other hand, Kerry beat Bush by less than 200 thousand in Michigan, so another 567 thousand net Republican votes puts Michigan in the red column in '08. A similar analysis shows NJ going from blue to red in '08.


7 posted on 11/07/2004 7:25:55 AM PST by IStillBelieve (G.W. Bush '04: Biggest popular vote victory in history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Yes, I know. I'm just playing with the numbers. ;-)


8 posted on 11/07/2004 7:26:27 AM PST by IStillBelieve (G.W. Bush '04: Biggest popular vote victory in history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: motife

election results ping


9 posted on 11/07/2004 8:02:48 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IStillBelieve

The States Kerry put significant resources into, he did better in. But those states are few in number. He ignored the South and West and even half of the northeast. Without additional Media help, he would have been slaughtered across the board.


10 posted on 11/07/2004 8:20:32 AM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IStillBelieve

LOL and Nevada is statisticlly a tie!


11 posted on 11/07/2004 8:32:58 AM PST by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: motife
Wow, it was an inspired bit of strategy on Senator Kerry's part to select a Southern running mate, don't you think? How'd that work out?

Here's a little something for Dems to ponder...


12 posted on 11/07/2004 8:37:17 AM PST by southernnorthcarolina (I support tax cuts for the rich... and I VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife

IT's amazing that most of the states on Kerry's list did have substantial support for Nader 4 years ago. i.e. Oregon, Minnesota, Vermont...etc.


13 posted on 11/07/2004 9:49:12 AM PST by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife
Great stats, and thanks for posting them. I've always kept a close watch on state percentages, how much a given state leads or trails the national figures in terms of GOP margins, and how the differentials are moving from year to year.

Your numbers remind me of when I realized the exit poll numbers were bogus. Indiana comes in very fast, and it was clear by 7:30 EST, just 30 minutes after the polls closed, that President Bush was running a couple of points ahead of his 2000 margin. At about the same time, the President was running a point or two behind his 2000 performance in Kentucky. But it was instantly apparent that most of Louisville had reported at a time when only a quarter or so of statewide returns were in, as demonstrated by the fact that about 80% of Anne Northup's district had reported. So I felt that Bush would end up outperforming his 2000 numbers in Kentucky, and that Bunning would win, even though he trailed substantially early on.

Also quite early in the evening, West Virginia was called for President Bush (though no numbers were posted until later). So, with three states bordering on obviously critical Ohio appearing to be performing better in 2004 than in 2000, I had become quite comfortable about the outcome long before the media (mainstream or otherwise) began to hint of a GOP win.

14 posted on 11/07/2004 10:50:19 AM PST by southernnorthcarolina (I support tax cuts for the rich... and I VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: motife

I haven't seen anyone say it yet but of this new voter that broke heavily for bush how many were "unlikely voters" .


15 posted on 11/07/2004 4:03:37 PM PST by festus (All Your Electoral Votes Are Belong To Us !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson