To: FBD; Landru; snopercod; First_Salute; Mudboy Slim; NittanyLion; ForGod'sSake; BraveMan; tet68; ...
Comment invited, pro or con.
2 posted on
11/07/2004 3:57:22 PM PST by
joanie-f
(I've been called a princess, right down to my glass sneakers and enchanted sweatpants.)
To: joanie-f
"What Should Arlen Specter’s Role Be?"
Cloak room hat-check boy...
4 posted on
11/07/2004 4:01:22 PM PST by
Tulsa Brian
("Be good and you will be lonesome.." Mark Twain)
To: joanie-f
Thanks for the numbers, will call tomorrow.
5 posted on
11/07/2004 4:01:37 PM PST by
Taggart_D
To: joanie-f
Specter's new role should involve a mop and bucket.
Now that I've said that, let me actually read the article.
6 posted on
11/07/2004 4:01:40 PM PST by
perfect stranger
(The Hummer is a regular Pat Buchanan on wheels." PJ O'Rourke from C&D magazine)
To: joanie-f
What comment? We all know that Spectre has to go.
7 posted on
11/07/2004 4:02:31 PM PST by
Malleus Dei
("Communists are just Democrats in a hurry.")
To: joanie-f
Put Specter on a transportation committee. Pa. roads could use the pork. He shouldn't be near anything involving national defense, the judiciary, etc.
20 posted on
11/07/2004 4:15:41 PM PST by
peyton randolph
(Time for Bush to pack the U.S. Supremes)
To: joanie-f
I agree with your 3 crusades, If you include the democrat party and the MSM into number one.. because literally not figureably they are in league with the enemy(s) of this country.. How to do that?.. make them(MSM) persona non grata at press conferences generally.. at least seated in another room watching on a monitor.. bring Ari Fleicher back..
22 posted on
11/07/2004 4:24:53 PM PST by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: joanie-f
Well, I've emailed and *written* Frist. Living in MA, that is about all I can do really.
Overall though, I voted, and worked, for the Republicans to continue the WoT and to get strict constructionist judges appointed.
Any other issue is secondary, but the Reps had better not compromise on these two. They have political capital, and they better spend it on these issues.
It looks like Bush is already starting in on the terrorists in Fallujah, and the Reps better be prepared to follow through on judges. I don't see how Specter on the SJC helps the latter at all...
28 posted on
11/07/2004 4:36:12 PM PST by
swilhelm73
(I voted for Bush. You're welcome.)
To: joanie-f
joanie-f, very good post. Alot of common sense there. I applaud you.
31 posted on
11/07/2004 4:42:21 PM PST by
Dawgreg
(Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
To: joanie-f
WOW! GWB's plate is full.
34 posted on
11/07/2004 4:46:19 PM PST by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
To: joanie-f
There is nothing in the Constitution that requires that the chair of the senate Judiciary Committee to be elected on a seniority basis.
The senate may elect anyone from among its membership to chair that all-important committee.
It is now time to discard dangerous and liberty-erosive tradition and political protocol and, instead, elect as chairman of the judiciary committee a Constitutional scholar who reveres the genuine Constitutional definition of the judicial branch of government.
Under such a common sense, preserve-America definition, Alren Specter does not qualify.
WELL SAID!
83 posted on
11/07/2004 8:14:59 PM PST by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: joanie-f; Landru; FBD; MeekOneGOP; Mudboy Slim
Looks like you've covered everything....almost ;^)
Scotland should maybe have their very own U.S. ambassador doncha think. A special envoy that speaks the language.
FGS
90 posted on
11/07/2004 8:52:23 PM PST by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: joanie-f
Thanks for posting, Joanie.
I imagine Spectors role will inlcude a spot on the committee. But it would be a tremendous victory if he could be kept from being the Chairman.
Who do you think has the best chance? Orrin Hatch?
Also, thanks for posting numbers to the judiciary committee.
Republican Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee:
Orrin Hatch 202-224-5251
Charles Grassley 202-224-3744
John Kyl 202-224-4521
Jeff Sessions 202-224-4124
Lindsey Graham 202-224-5972
John Cornyn 202-224-2934
Mike DeWine 202-224-2315
Larry Craig 202-224-2752
Saxby Chambliss 202-224-3521
98 posted on
11/08/2004 7:52:00 AM PST by
FBD
(Democrats have never learned from the second or third or fifth kick of a mule. - Zell Miller)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson