We must consider that a justice with the above qualifications, even if he is personally pro-life, may still come down on the pro-chosed side of the issue in his rullings. A non-activist judge who would 'strictly apply the law' also means not actively promoting a pro-life agenda, either. The issue still comes back to the fundamental biological/legal classification of the unborn. One might successfully argue that the unborn are not 'persons' in the legal sense and under the Constitution. Short of an Amendment, I think the most that can be done is to allow abortion to be regulated at the state level.
ff