O'Connor has never suggested that the Court "rely" on iL merely that it will "consider" it. I "consider" voting for a RAT every time I enter the polls but never do because I consider what he stands for. I can "consider" what Russian law says without it prejudicing me in any way against the US Constitution.
These are groundless fears now and were six months ago when a similiar discussion took place. Of course, you ignored what I pointed out wrt our own past.
The Supreme Court is supposed to interpret the Constitution of the United States...not foreign rulings...not international law. She has made it a duty and I hope she chokes on those very words.