Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An ominous Specter
Townhall.com ^ | November 9, 2004 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 11/08/2004 11:47:29 PM PST by El Oviedo

As the hearings went on, it became clear that Senator Specter's agenda was also more important to him than the Constitution's separation of powers, for the Senator was clearly judging Judge Bork not on his high qualifications but on whether or not he was likely to uphold policies that Senator Specter liked.

He demanded to know "where's the predictability in Judge Bork." He asked: "Where's the assurances for this committee and the Senate of where you'll be?"

Judges in general, and Justices of the Supreme court in particular, are supposed to be impartial and independent in judging the specific merits of whatever cases arise -- not predictable. What does the separation of powers mean if one branch of government can prescribe in advance what members of another branch of government must do on specific issues?

Then and now, Senator Specter has been one of those to whom what matters is not a judicial nominee's qualifications but how they are likely to vote on abortion, anti-trust laws, or whatever.

Senator Specter is also one of those people who is often wrong but never in doubt. He has mangled the meaning of such basic concepts as "judicial activism" and "original intent." It would be a tragedy for him to become chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he could mangle nominees and in the process mangle the Constitution of the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: specterjudiciary
This shows the real side of Senator Specter specially when he asked "Where's the predictability in Judge Bork?" Isn't that a litmus test that Specter since this PM only denies of using?
1 posted on 11/08/2004 11:47:30 PM PST by El Oviedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: El Oviedo
Arlen "Scottish Law" Spectre?

Send for 007!

2 posted on 11/09/2004 12:12:29 AM PST by ImpBill (Twas a very good election for the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Oviedo
Bork him ....... under ancient Scottish Law.

. there are so many reasons this waste of skin should not be given the chairmanship ........ that he chose to evoke Ancient Scottish law to rationalize/weasel away his Constitutional responsibility is reason enough.

Give him the Magic Bullet

,

3 posted on 11/09/2004 12:18:47 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
It's up to us to keep the pressure on. Plenty of information here as well as a link to StopSpecterNow.com with all contact info for email, phone, snail mail. We should all be calling everyday.
4 posted on 11/09/2004 12:33:16 AM PST by Bonaparte (twisting slowly, slowly in the wind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill
Remember it's S.P.E.C.T.R.E

SPECTRE - the Special Executive for Counterintelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion

5 posted on 11/09/2004 3:26:44 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson