Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry hints White House run in his future: reports (It's over Johnny)
AFP ^ | Tue, Nov 09, 2004

Posted on 11/09/2004 10:47:20 AM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: presidio9

41 posted on 11/09/2004 11:58:45 AM PST by smith288 (I have posted over 10,000 times. The more I post, the more intelligent you become!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin

They should limit the primaries in 2008 to those who have run before--McGovern, Carter, Mondale, Gore, and Kerry, and perhaps include those who failed to get the nomination like Biden, Babbitt, Bradley, Dean, Sharpton and Lieberman. The winner of the nomination would be the best of the worst.


42 posted on 11/09/2004 12:00:54 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Kerry has deluded himself into thinking that he hasn't joined the McGovern/Mondale/Dukakis/Gore Irrelevancy club.

He'll be lucky to hang onto his Senate seat, in fact. ......and his meal ticket wife.

43 posted on 11/09/2004 12:01:01 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
He'll be lucky to hang onto his Senate seat

In Massachusettes? Not likely. Losing a presidential election never hurt Fat Teddy Kennedy. Then again, neither did murder.

44 posted on 11/09/2004 12:04:05 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
In Massachusettes? Not likely

To another lib/Dem, not a Pubbie.

Losing a presidential election never hurt Fat Teddy Kennedy.

He lost in the primaries, not in the general election.

45 posted on 11/09/2004 12:14:47 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

And he lost to the worst president in the country's history...Jimmah Cahtah. How embarrassing.


46 posted on 11/09/2004 12:20:36 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Breaux told CNN television Monday, hinting that Kerry lacked the pizzazz to appeal to a broad-based public.

You noticed.

Actually, great numbers of "broads" they expected to vote for him turned their backs on his pizzazz-free campaign. Nixed his alcohol-and-drug-addled wife as First Lady too.

47 posted on 11/09/2004 12:32:06 PM PST by Veto! (Happy denizen of BushWorld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Of course this is assuming that his bag lady is still around to co-sign for any loans...


48 posted on 11/09/2004 12:34:39 PM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repealthe17thAmendment
Hey, if you're gonna bring someone back, why not George McGovern? Jimmy Carter? Michael Dukakis? Walter Mondale?

Didn't they dust this guy off 2 years ago?
49 posted on 11/09/2004 12:42:16 PM PST by BlueMondaySkipper (The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Potential slogans:

We can't lose three in row!

The third time is the charm!

Two losers can be a winner!



Two wrongs make a right!
50 posted on 11/09/2004 12:44:45 PM PST by BlueMondaySkipper (The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

ROTFLMPO ...

The chances of this are even less than those of Hitlery winning in '08

But, anyway, JoKe, BRING IT ON!!!

Schadenfreude is a wonderful thing...


51 posted on 11/09/2004 1:12:34 PM PST by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueMondaySkipper

In 1984 Mondale lost everywhere except Minnesota (winning there by a microscopic margin) and the District of Columbia. In 2002 he managed to lose Minnesota in the Senate race, thus having a clean sweep of the states. Now if he will just run for an office in DC and get beat...


52 posted on 11/09/2004 1:39:13 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

3 words of advice for Kerry: Swift, boat, vets.


53 posted on 11/09/2004 5:40:17 PM PST by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnfkerrysucks

By conceding too quickly, you mean before january 2005, right?


54 posted on 11/09/2004 6:40:55 PM PST by texasflower (Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Kerry will NOT get the nomination in 2008, that's one everybody can take to the bank. He may very well run, but he won't get the nod. The only reason he got it this time was by default, he was seen as "electable"--the dems thought his Vietnam background would innoculate him from the dems' achilles heel of being soft on defense.

Also--about 2/3rds of Kerry voters only voted for him because he wasn't Bush, not because of love for Kerry. Any other generic dem would have gotten the same amount of votes. Bush won't be on the ticket in 2008 to run against. Most of the dems couldn't give a rat's a$$ for him, and are mad because, like Al Gore, he blew an election that he should have resoundingly won. He won't have another shot at the big prize.

55 posted on 11/10/2004 12:29:09 AM PST by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
He made a terrible mistake. He actually conceded! His party has decided that you ain't the President until the judges say you are or aren't and then you still argue for years that you were cheated! He is toast.
56 posted on 11/10/2004 12:39:40 AM PST by ladyinred (Congratulations President Bush! Four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Kerry's younger brother Cameron told the Boston Globe newspaper the senator was "profoundly disappointed" about narrowly losing last week's election to President George W. Bush and deems another attempt fully possible.

"That's conceivable," the paper quoted the brother as saying. "I don't know why that (last week's loss) should necessarily be it."


What a hoot. He still doesn't get it. Robert Novak proposed "Is Kerry even Relevant?". His point being that the Dems really didn't care about Kerry or even what he took as positions during the campaign. They just wanted anyone but Bush. Kerry used the Dems, the Dems used Kerry. Kerry thinks he was picked because of him. He was picked because he was not Bush.

This is the height of delusion. He has started his long march to obscurity.

Mr Sol
57 posted on 11/10/2004 3:05:36 AM PST by Solar Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
To another lib/Dem, not a Pubbie.

Please. He has done nothing for 18 years and they keep electing him. They will all drink the kool-aid again. I was just up in Boston last weekend. They LOVE him up there.

58 posted on 11/10/2004 6:39:28 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

He must have enjoyed his candidacy more than we did.


59 posted on 11/10/2004 6:51:48 AM PST by altura (Has Kerry taken off the yellow bracelet yet??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson