[Rippin]

Sigh. How exactly do you come to that astonishingly incorrect assessment? (that anything that disagrees with you on this matter is bad, else good)

I asked you if you agreed there could be a bad "pro" evolution article and the only answer you've been able to envision is a Lamarkian "evolution" article. Improve on that answer or count yourself among them with small minds. Your call.

[orionblamblam]

> asked you if you agreed there could be a bad "pro" evolution article and the only answer you've been able to envision is a Lamarkian "evolution" article.

I suppose you want me to list every single possibility for a "bad" article on evolution?